From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF27FA04FD; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 11:46:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 632471C237; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 11:46:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.61]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0E91C201 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 11:46:38 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1578998798; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=YPWaZHIzo16eC8zxf/E0nPAPsTvRcyIPAYekduTpfto=; b=FTExTO+a1M/6uojO/dQZa9RnobVr2CjzndWuUskA4I+YRiVlRk+SpW69RiJJuDPdwyQvE0 lmMYVEGeXNGHjYrvXnQmZmsiqOl1swir+SkfEZljaokkaV9wId7TDTGVF477WBybluAFOY 1oX81neXJigx0mFpvzQyIAVgpYFhNww= Received: from mail-vk1-f198.google.com (mail-vk1-f198.google.com [209.85.221.198]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-140-Z1vXcjb4MFKHWMNjYX1f-Q-1; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 05:46:35 -0500 Received: by mail-vk1-f198.google.com with SMTP id a20so5635848vkm.22 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 02:46:35 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jST09vCOWXdqMbbys6BXX6mj9pl25caqWhDG7pFS8Ng=; b=PnE2XVc+1R4JPHTS8D/QK9bYdE5KBb010idXmdvR6parh6PGesln9vXW6Ck7mNUO33 N7cvvNVFUdGgcdDDWld0cyZu4SlumWa8vXxSTlg2tImernQDUS0ORBUhSZ3yrBL2p258 J1EA94JKvnDMxNLqfwJoFxlx7h7NrBzj0rjUUzhhBXvZJXKoEgdrCzbBHL3mo3J3p7dC 67nn09PGGiJMaToOGitxRvvlcyVrtLdcRtGrXshHgmMtr5gHqQTX/of85+jsa00DMDmv I5hy79iHZXV30S670qYGd3CPwbOqkhDSBpWQJyP9DPLiLASSFe2fGlKHvr1d3uBd/0TU VMUA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXV9ugenmAZiihYJQM3UqF2zvT1KZsJAd7F1BYvrLy4hmafkY6a Yny0uBizkuaplmnBaebCWq5T0vKWtjODUFXm+Mh0UNVUg9C8AZ3p6xYznqhSkHn9F+douuFnC5Q FTOsGtnemCySJrslTLxo= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:2408:: with SMTP id f8mr10076697uan.126.1578998794835; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 02:46:34 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzbyikJzplGKjxNj95FKl/xskGffD3Fg8zjZLxDYAtUgdvVuMsmCdIF3RTIESShss/VAu5oXZNtrblAIQJM9GI= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:2408:: with SMTP id f8mr10076684uan.126.1578998794572; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 02:46:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200114100559.19794-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> <1926662.K71DO8KEF6@xps> <3216938.qSoW2BAyJ8@xps> In-Reply-To: <3216938.qSoW2BAyJ8@xps> From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 11:46:23 +0100 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: Cristian Dumitrescu , "Yigit, Ferruh" , dev , "Singh, Jasvinder" X-MC-Unique: Z1vXcjb4MFKHWMNjYX1f-Q-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: set git tree for packet framework and QoS X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 11:36 AM Thomas Monjalon wrot= e: > > 14/01/2020 11:27, David Marchand: > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 11:23 AM Thomas Monjalon = wrote: > > > 14/01/2020 11:05, David Marchand: > > > About ethdev TM and MTR, I am not sure what is the right thing to do. > > > > The drivers using those apis are in dpdk-next-net. > > Yes this is my question: > Is it fine merging QoS related patches on ethdev, drivers and testpmd > in dpdk-next-net, or do we want them to be managed separately in dpdk-nex= t-qos? > There is not much activity here, so I am just anticipating a heavier acti= vity. If we move those files under the qos subtree, it will be impossible (?) to identify QoS only changes on those drivers, so we will end with the patches going to master. --=20 David Marchand