From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0E82A0A02; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:51:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A1A1140DCE; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:51:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE6D04067B for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:51:46 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1616683906; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=lsDxxvzYfrT8uV3ro2Rp6BgoCkEKm77U2xXZvl47C8Y=; b=jE0AySGSTuT//3TaM8t6L59UHsNbMGoHhS0ZevBUVpRJ8H7l45ngVabKv3y1vKjandBPXz QQa67LhTqXPupQ7x/RfNiyWnM/r1Fe7CyHfun7fP079tCvIsc/qhyywPWTM1kKEvPtouTL tEMW11wRbwUU98U8NqhtRlexsTuAF/M= Received: from mail-ua1-f71.google.com (mail-ua1-f71.google.com [209.85.222.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-590-3lZxaMG5PleBmwAq-JcfPQ-1; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 10:51:44 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 3lZxaMG5PleBmwAq-JcfPQ-1 Received: by mail-ua1-f71.google.com with SMTP id f1so1857492uaj.5 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 07:51:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lsDxxvzYfrT8uV3ro2Rp6BgoCkEKm77U2xXZvl47C8Y=; b=ocpPMyLdTna+u/NPORFCdRYoAvVEJAPp7zH6M3U2BnVx8M+Q7y5+yuv/LGIHr4J1V4 lRuAagFYdzEw1YlWUQvguwKfBBR1X73qbiaS3P3n1lMwIrHxJv/TWJjf5SrEDQEB5Knh L8Q0LQsklErg94Lv4CmDtvowRgl6b1KwvmMgH0TQaWvrrHfInlQQ0gABcgoLN7v5zq4W 9Nb81g0NWajd3WV1uiAC3RRUv2kk8IQ0YdE2tCVOuvgPBntYYC77+fPuK4WyOYoS/1s5 a0lGJvRJZDoolbR39NIF154QOwCNKeqzuJFsIPPp9ixTA+YiJiEE6oufm3grzIFIx9aN 4V7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533C/zeAnknSEGdOqz4EioCuKyCDYGg7b3dFSru0DhX1U2yPo33V glrXuAxiZr5ICnnSnH3nubAeRtPuvktjLawc4H66TO0Bn70uEeIl0j8s7wKr9xlX/l/kj0bj5c/ 4h/0BmS5VLp6Kz30iEBg= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:aa43:: with SMTP id t64mr5340394vke.22.1616683904228; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 07:51:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzjvf8rERn2n3e4X/0e3K9nXotohEqkEGrYq7L7G2Rr54ZAC2vTIif4MvJDYhhMhwbVtF4C3wn6EZrT1q0q38I= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:aa43:: with SMTP id t64mr5340387vke.22.1616683904066; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 07:51:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1BA38E99-C6F7-4A17-B6CA-D1D06F707590@juniper.net> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:51:32 +0100 Message-ID: To: Kiran KN Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , Thomas Monjalon Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: changes for setting control thread mask X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 10:01 AM David Marchand wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 9:42 AM Kiran KN wrote: > > Define a global variable ctrl_thread_set which the application can set. > > If this is the case, use this for setting control thread affinity instead > > of deducing it from the existing core pinning of the process. > > I am unconvinced on adding an EAL option for this. > It needs an explanation on why you can't rely on the dpdk process > current affinity for control threads. > And we will need a unit test. > > Please rebase your patch on master too. > > > signed-off-by: Kiran KN > > Signed-off-by* Is this patch abandoned? Thanks. -- David Marchand