From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: mosesyyoung@gmail.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] eal/linux: skip vfio for non-privileged container
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 08:46:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8xGa0y2v_ejaVF8CumzFxK7C5n1=0d4=iQH2ucmLQkiow@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250327075711.648-1-ming.1.yang@nokia-sbell.com>
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 8:57 AM Yang Ming <ming.1.yang@nokia-sbell.com> wrote:
>
> DPDK detect vfio container according the existence of vfio
> module. But for container with non-privileged mode, there is
> possibility that no VFIO_DIR(/dev/vfio) mapping from host to
> container when host have both Intel NIC and Mellanox NIC but
> this conntainer only allocate VFs from Mellanox NIC.
> In this case, vfio kernel module has already been loaded from
> the host.
> This scenario will cause the error log occurs in DPDK primary
> process as below:
> 'EAL: cannot open VFIO container, error 2 (No such file or
> directory)'
> 'EAL: VFIO support could not be initialized'
> Because `rte_vfio_enable()` call `rte_vfio_get_container_fd()`
> to execute `vfio_container_fd = open(VFIO_CONTAINER_PATH,
> O_RDWR);` but VFIO_CONTAINER_PATH(/dev/vfio/vfio) doesn't exist
> in this container.
> This scenario will also lead to the delay of DPDK secondary
> process because `default_vfio_cfg->vfio_enabled = 0` and
> `default_vfio_cfg->vfio_container_fd = -1`, socket error will
> be set in DPDK primary process when it sync this info to
> the secondary process.
> This patch use to skip this kind of useless detection for this
> scenario.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Ming <ming.1.yang@nokia-sbell.com>
With such a change, is the check on the passed kernel module still needed?
--
David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-16 6:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-17 7:28 [PATCH] Skip vfio in the scenario of non-privileged mode Yang Ming
2025-01-17 16:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-01-22 8:15 ` Yang Ming
2025-02-26 3:10 ` Yang Ming
2025-02-26 13:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-02-28 5:23 ` Yang Ming
2025-03-27 7:57 ` [PATCH v2] eal/linux: skip vfio for non-privileged container Yang Ming
2025-05-16 6:46 ` David Marchand [this message]
2025-05-16 11:08 ` Moses Young
2025-05-16 13:30 ` Burakov, Anatoly
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJFAV8xGa0y2v_ejaVF8CumzFxK7C5n1=0d4=iQH2ucmLQkiow@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=mosesyyoung@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).