From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A1D4590C; Thu, 5 Sep 2024 10:11:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7026B42DCA; Thu, 5 Sep 2024 10:11:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E734025C for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2024 10:11:07 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1725523867; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=E0zzO17YVyuzYWGs0JLDAdCQ77ExZWzTs68JOMY0XNE=; b=cW5/E5HO6weMvkDXcYRG3t2opAM9F16HibMrn75mJHbtfvTLxjdtJbUb+eerbZhkc7tdQQ j4e37Mx/nyNoNWla3InHOLCuWc9dizIPEpWdezdmKdS5GtnLIoJZSfne8ImFVWko+flYVl nkP1H/ndOvZeImVcPBfsWfH5ID7qmEU= Received: from mail-lj1-f197.google.com (mail-lj1-f197.google.com [209.85.208.197]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-227-eVuNa-6PNGCfY3rmavS7qg-1; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 04:11:06 -0400 X-MC-Unique: eVuNa-6PNGCfY3rmavS7qg-1 Received: by mail-lj1-f197.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2f3ec7fcfecso4852811fa.2 for ; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 01:11:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1725523865; x=1726128665; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=E0zzO17YVyuzYWGs0JLDAdCQ77ExZWzTs68JOMY0XNE=; b=q5+HdnGylx51+V5pkwPVMUWu/cKwLGtwMcgxbS8Fgo74dyB8Zl7IWBQHlXJKM1LVLi h01prggoR9CrEby2FU3DGThOOoNkkQNxuQAPGTRuZ1BEHjA2w5L7e5BBIJ1tUrTuHZWg YSIGIml/B1q9hpLZc8bf0YndAnYGYw8ZeRsSHrbJTuCuLL7wfDa5yQqEDW4xwPZ1xl+D Uz4v6CGU6mgVWA8mWL8Xhj64ABbQTLhDsfdpDeE8ayRnlofNSxMSs6h4NDTcMWBgQmeG 98hs5OW5Uwm/OcxiE9nzjfZH6OLQyWrK0sD/d3VxesTJfqIZ1P/l/s21/hmKKDuX92k4 OJGA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCViGYj599rP3s1CeYWuw6TQkpcnpHTHyALwjR8xSzG6b58MQ19C0aGEbvfo36YyEF1m2ec=@dpdk.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyfz1HFgnDMzFoyNq6f/W1n2gVmB8HlWtmwsfr+IRQgv5fa0Gqt 0AigYMhj9OfOhyatEiZct8GR5BsuLCRXzcoR/UP20vweN+XcJEOq4FlNi2w4gwwtkDFwK24Kt3M CRDIbTkaMqwHyOCmozvAJhL7kOv8cpmebh/W7fjRG18VG7T0scjbTr3VBk+4y0h6uheHK7fKoCJ o2uCEe2ZytZPsifkI= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:19a3:b0:2f5:15f7:7165 with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2f64446dfedmr73708971fa.33.1725523864840; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 01:11:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF+VLLDrfULVwSCESZbAmN2+1Wt6mnQJlW4YJBtwkyPftr6AKL4JH3E76s/z5RsXjxIID1X24thwyHtq3d2Gcc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:19a3:b0:2f5:15f7:7165 with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2f64446dfedmr73708591fa.33.1725523864269; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 01:11:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240809095829.589396-2-mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com> <20240812124930.604796-1-mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 10:10:52 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Improve EAL bit operations API To: =?UTF-8?Q?Mattias_R=C3=B6nnblom?= , Tyler Retzlaff Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Mattias_R=C3=B6nnblom?= , dev@dpdk.org, Heng Wang , Stephen Hemminger , =?UTF-8?Q?Morten_Br=C3=B8rup?= , Jack Bond-Preston , Thomas Monjalon X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Hello, On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 7:05=E2=80=AFPM Mattias R=C3=B6nnblom wrote: > > On 2024-08-12 14:49, Mattias R=C3=B6nnblom wrote: > > This patch set represent an attempt to improve and extend the RTE > > bitops API, in particular for functions that operate on individual > > bits. > > > > Is there anyone else that has any opinion on this patch set? Details, or > big picture. Tyler, are you ok with this series? Mattias, there are issues reported by the CI (compilation on Ubuntu 22.04 in GHA, and unit test failure in UNH), please have a look. --=20 David Marchand