From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: "Mattias Rönnblom" <hofors@lysator.liu.se>
Cc: "Mattias Rönnblom" <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com>,
dev@dpdk.org, "Heng Wang" <heng.wang@ericsson.com>,
"Stephen Hemminger" <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
"Tyler Retzlaff" <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>,
"Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>,
"Jack Bond-Preston" <jack.bond-preston@foss.arm.com>,
"Chengwen Feng" <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 6/7] eal: add unit tests for atomic bit access functions
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 10:35:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8xRRt0nOTkoP0E0+dcqVhisfPWchUDSEf3pjrO-sToFAw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d406ca52-7a3a-4af7-91b9-e5248ad9dbba@lysator.liu.se>
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 1:56 PM Mattias Rönnblom <hofors@lysator.liu.se> wrote:
>
> On 2024-10-10 12:45, David Marchand wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 12:57 PM Mattias Rönnblom
> > <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com> wrote:
> >> + static int \
> >> + run_parallel_test_and_modify ## size(void *arg) \
> >> + { \
> >> + struct parallel_test_and_set_lcore ## size *lcore = arg; \
> >> + uint64_t deadline = rte_get_timer_cycles() + \
> >> + PARALLEL_TEST_RUNTIME * rte_get_timer_hz(); \
> >> + do { \
> >> + bool old_value; \
> >> + bool new_value = rte_rand() & 1; \
> >> + bool use_assign = rte_rand() & 1; \
> >> + \
> >> + if (use_assign) \
> >> + old_value = rte_bit_atomic_test_and_assign( \
> >> + lcore->word, lcore->bit, new_value, \
> >> + rte_memory_order_relaxed); \
> >> + else \
> >> + old_value = new_value ? \
> >> + rte_bit_atomic_test_and_set( \
> >> + lcore->word, lcore->bit, \
> >> + rte_memory_order_relaxed) : \
> >> + rte_bit_atomic_test_and_clear( \
> >> + lcore->word, lcore->bit, \
> >> + rte_memory_order_relaxed); \
> >> + if (old_value != new_value) \
> >> + lcore->flips++; \
> >> + } while (rte_get_timer_cycles() < deadline); \
> >> + \
> >> + return 0; \
> >> + } \
> >> + \
> >> + static int \
> >> + test_bit_atomic_parallel_test_and_modify ## size(void) \
> >> + { \
> >> + unsigned int worker_lcore_id; \
> >> + uint ## size ## _t word = 0; \
> >> + unsigned int bit = rte_rand_max(size); \
> >> + struct parallel_test_and_set_lcore ## size lmain = { \
> >> + .word = &word, \
> >> + .bit = bit \
> >> + }; \
> >> + struct parallel_test_and_set_lcore ## size lworker = { \
> >> + .word = &word, \
> >> + .bit = bit \
> >> + }; \
> >> + \
> >> + if (rte_lcore_count() < 2) { \
> >> + printf("Need multiple cores to run parallel test.\n"); \
> >> + return TEST_SKIPPED; \
> >> + } \
> >> + \
> >> + worker_lcore_id = rte_get_next_lcore(-1, 1, 0); \
> >> + \
> >> + int rc = rte_eal_remote_launch(run_parallel_test_and_modify ## size, \
> >> + &lworker, worker_lcore_id); \
> >> + TEST_ASSERT(rc == 0, "Worker thread launch failed"); \
> >> + \
> >> + run_parallel_test_and_modify ## size(&lmain); \
> >> + \
> >> + rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); \
> >> + \
> >> + uint64_t total_flips = lmain.flips + lworker.flips; \
> >> + bool expected_value = total_flips % 2; \
> >> + \
> >> + TEST_ASSERT(expected_value == rte_bit_test(&word, bit), \
> >> + "After %"PRId64" flips, the bit value " \
> >> + "should be %d", total_flips, expected_value); \
> >> + \
> >> + uint64_t expected_word = 0; \
> >> + rte_bit_assign(&expected_word, bit, expected_value); \
> >> + \
> >> + TEST_ASSERT(expected_word == word, "Untouched bits have " \
> >> + "changed value"); \
> >> + \
> >> + return TEST_SUCCESS; \
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> +GEN_TEST_BIT_PARALLEL_TEST_AND_MODIFY(32)
> >> +GEN_TEST_BIT_PARALLEL_TEST_AND_MODIFY(64)
> >
> > It appears this test failed once in the CI for an unrelated series
> > (uAPI kernel header import):
> > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/testruns/logs/1385993/
> >
> > + TestCase [ 0] : test_bit_access32 succeeded
> > + TestCase [ 1] : test_bit_access64 succeeded
> > + TestCase [ 2] : test_bit_access32 succeeded
> > + TestCase [ 3] : test_bit_access64 succeeded
> > + TestCase [ 4] : test_bit_v_access32 succeeded
> > + TestCase [ 5] : test_bit_v_access64 succeeded
> > + TestCase [ 6] : test_bit_atomic_access32 succeeded
> > + TestCase [ 7] : test_bit_atomic_access64 succeeded
> > + TestCase [ 8] : test_bit_atomic_v_access32 succeeded
> > + TestCase [ 9] : test_bit_atomic_v_access64 succeeded
> > + TestCase [10] : test_bit_atomic_parallel_assign32 succeeded
> > + TestCase [11] : test_bit_atomic_parallel_assign64 succeeded
> > + TestCase [12] : test_bit_atomic_parallel_test_and_modify32 failed
> > + TestCase [13] : test_bit_atomic_parallel_test_and_modify64 succeeded
> > + TestCase [14] : test_bit_atomic_parallel_flip32 succeeded
> > + TestCase [15] : test_bit_atomic_parallel_flip64 succeeded
> > + TestCase [16] : test_bit_relaxed_set succeeded
> > + TestCase [17] : test_bit_relaxed_clear succeeded
> > + TestCase [18] : test_bit_relaxed_test_set_clear succeeded
> >
> > EAL: Test assert test_bit_atomic_parallel_test_and_modify32 line 236
> > failed: After 1070523 flips, the bit value should be 1
> >
>
> I've been unable to reproduce this on my Raptor Lake x86_64 with GCC
> 12.3 (CI machine used GCC 12.2).
>
> I'll try if I have better luck on some other systems.
Could it have to do with how UNH tests in containers?
(with physical cores that may not be isolated/dedicated to a process).
This morning, I see at least two similar errors, on the same part of the test:
https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20241010203209.63911-1-nandinipersad361@gmail.com/
EAL: Test assert test_bit_atomic_parallel_test_and_modify32 line 236
failed: After 1719375 flips, the bit value should be 1
https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20241010194148.1877659-18-rjarry@redhat.com/
EAL: Test assert test_bit_atomic_parallel_test_and_modify32 line 236
failed: After 1199935 flips, the bit value should be 1
--
David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-11 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 114+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-31 13:13 [RFC v3] eal: add bitset type Mattias Rönnblom
2024-01-31 16:02 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-01-31 16:28 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-01-31 16:06 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-01-31 18:45 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-02-01 8:04 ` Morten Brørup
2024-02-02 10:19 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-02-02 12:42 ` Morten Brørup
2024-02-16 10:23 ` [RFC v4 1/4] " Mattias Rönnblom
2024-02-16 10:23 ` [RFC v4 2/4] eal: add bitset test suite Mattias Rönnblom
2024-02-16 10:23 ` [RFC v4 3/4] service: use multi-word bitset to represent service flags Mattias Rönnblom
2024-02-16 10:23 ` [RFC v4 4/4] event/dsw: optimize serving port logic Mattias Rönnblom
2024-05-05 7:33 ` [RFC v5 1/6] eal: add bitset type Mattias Rönnblom
2024-05-05 7:33 ` [RFC v5 2/6] eal: add bitset test suite Mattias Rönnblom
2024-05-05 7:33 ` [RFC v5 3/6] eal: add atomic bitset functions Mattias Rönnblom
2024-05-05 7:33 ` [RFC v5 4/6] eal: add unit tests for atomic bitset operations Mattias Rönnblom
2024-05-05 7:33 ` [RFC v5 5/6] service: use multi-word bitset to represent service flags Mattias Rönnblom
2024-05-05 7:33 ` [RFC v5 6/6] event/dsw: optimize serving port logic Mattias Rönnblom
2024-08-09 20:14 ` [PATCH 1/6] eal: add bitset type Mattias Rönnblom
2024-08-09 20:14 ` [PATCH 2/6] eal: add bitset test suite Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-12 4:51 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2024-08-09 20:14 ` [PATCH 3/6] eal: add atomic bitset functions Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-12 4:51 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2024-08-09 20:14 ` [PATCH 4/6] eal: add unit tests for atomic bitset operations Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-12 4:52 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2024-10-09 20:29 ` Morten Brørup
2024-08-09 20:14 ` [PATCH 5/6] service: use multi-word bitset to represent service flags Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-12 4:52 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2024-08-09 20:14 ` [PATCH 6/6] event/dsw: add support for larger port count Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-12 4:53 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2024-08-20 17:09 ` [PATCH 1/6] eal: add bitset type Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-02 13:55 ` Morten Brørup
2024-09-02 14:46 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-02 14:49 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-12 4:51 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2024-09-17 9:36 ` [PATCH v7 0/6] Improve EAL bit operations API Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-17 9:36 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] dpdk: do not force C linkage on include file dependencies Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-17 10:48 ` [PATCH v8 0/6] Improve EAL bit operations API Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-17 10:48 ` [PATCH v8 1/6] dpdk: do not force C linkage on include file dependencies Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-18 9:04 ` [PATCH v9 0/6] Improve EAL bit operations API Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-18 9:04 ` [PATCH v9 1/6] dpdk: do not force C linkage on include file dependencies Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-19 19:31 ` [PATCH v10 0/7] Improve EAL bit operations API Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-19 19:31 ` [PATCH v10 1/7] buildtools/chkincs: relax C linkage requirement Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-20 6:24 ` [PATCH v11 0/7] Improve EAL bit operations API Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-20 6:24 ` [PATCH v11 1/7] buildtools/chkincs: relax C linkage requirement Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-20 10:47 ` [PATCH v12 0/7] Improve EAL bit operations API Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-20 10:47 ` [PATCH v12 1/7] buildtools/chkincs: relax C linkage requirement Mattias Rönnblom
2024-10-03 16:47 ` Robin Jarry
2024-10-04 7:31 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-10-04 8:05 ` Robin Jarry
2024-10-04 8:40 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-10-04 11:51 ` Robin Jarry
2024-10-04 12:19 ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-10-06 8:55 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-10-06 9:47 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-10-06 12:25 ` Robin Jarry
2024-10-06 13:09 ` Robin Jarry
2024-10-06 14:17 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-10-06 15:58 ` Robin Jarry
2024-10-10 10:24 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-10-10 10:39 ` Bruce Richardson
2024-09-20 10:47 ` [PATCH v12 2/7] dpdk: use C linkage only where appropriate Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-20 10:47 ` [PATCH v12 3/7] eal: extend bit manipulation functionality Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-20 10:47 ` [PATCH v12 4/7] eal: add unit tests for bit operations Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-20 10:47 ` [PATCH v12 5/7] eal: add atomic " Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-20 10:47 ` [PATCH v12 6/7] eal: add unit tests for atomic bit access functions Mattias Rönnblom
2024-10-10 10:45 ` David Marchand
2024-10-10 11:55 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-10-10 12:14 ` David Marchand
2024-10-10 12:35 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-10-10 13:07 ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-10-11 8:35 ` David Marchand [this message]
2024-10-11 15:06 ` Morten Brørup
2024-10-11 15:11 ` David Marchand
2024-10-11 15:15 ` Morten Brørup
2024-10-11 15:18 ` David Marchand
2024-09-20 10:47 ` [PATCH v12 7/7] eal: extend bitops to handle volatile pointers Mattias Rönnblom
2024-10-09 20:18 ` [PATCH v12 0/7] Improve EAL bit operations API David Marchand
2024-09-20 6:24 ` [PATCH v11 2/7] dpdk: use C linkage only where appropriate Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-20 6:24 ` [PATCH v11 3/7] eal: extend bit manipulation functionality Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-20 6:24 ` [PATCH v11 4/7] eal: add unit tests for bit operations Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-20 6:24 ` [PATCH v11 5/7] eal: add atomic " Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-20 6:24 ` [PATCH v11 6/7] eal: add unit tests for atomic bit access functions Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-20 6:24 ` [PATCH v11 7/7] eal: extend bitops to handle volatile pointers Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-19 19:31 ` [PATCH v10 2/7] dpdk: use C linkage only where appropriate Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-19 19:31 ` [PATCH v10 3/7] eal: extend bit manipulation functionality Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-19 19:31 ` [PATCH v10 4/7] eal: add unit tests for bit operations Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-19 19:31 ` [PATCH v10 5/7] eal: add atomic " Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-19 19:31 ` [PATCH v10 6/7] eal: add unit tests for atomic bit access functions Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-19 19:31 ` [PATCH v10 7/7] eal: extend bitops to handle volatile pointers Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-18 9:04 ` [PATCH v9 2/6] eal: extend bit manipulation functionality Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-18 9:04 ` [PATCH v9 3/6] eal: add unit tests for bit operations Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-18 9:04 ` [PATCH v9 4/6] eal: add atomic " Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-18 9:04 ` [PATCH v9 5/6] eal: add unit tests for atomic bit access functions Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-18 9:04 ` [PATCH v9 6/6] eal: extend bitops to handle volatile pointers Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-17 10:48 ` [PATCH v8 2/6] eal: extend bit manipulation functionality Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-17 10:48 ` [PATCH v8 3/6] eal: add unit tests for bit operations Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-17 10:48 ` [PATCH v8 4/6] eal: add atomic " Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-17 10:48 ` [PATCH v8 5/6] eal: add unit tests for atomic bit access functions Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-17 10:48 ` [PATCH v8 6/6] eal: extend bitops to handle volatile pointers Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-17 9:36 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] eal: extend bit manipulation functionality Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-17 9:36 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] eal: add unit tests for bit operations Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-17 9:36 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] eal: add atomic " Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-17 9:36 ` [PATCH v7 5/6] eal: add unit tests for atomic bit access functions Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-17 9:36 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] eal: extend bitops to handle volatile pointers Mattias Rönnblom
2024-10-10 8:30 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Add bitset type David Marchand
2024-10-10 8:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] eal: add " David Marchand
2024-10-11 9:35 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-10-16 11:30 ` David Marchand
2024-10-16 13:37 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-10-10 8:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] bitset: add atomic functions David Marchand
2024-10-10 8:30 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] service: use multi-word bitset to represent service flags David Marchand
2024-10-10 8:30 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] event/dsw: add support for larger port count David Marchand
2024-10-14 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Add bitset type David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJFAV8xRRt0nOTkoP0E0+dcqVhisfPWchUDSEf3pjrO-sToFAw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
--cc=heng.wang@ericsson.com \
--cc=hofors@lysator.liu.se \
--cc=jack.bond-preston@foss.arm.com \
--cc=mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com \
--cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).