From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Lukasz Wojciechowski <l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>
Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
"Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal: fix lcore state bug
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 19:10:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8xWa6WZy_GAZ2yrY6qrCWbyjGaMWYjLhXUjpDd2QnM+bQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR11MB3143C1108734B55D30E26B37D7670@BYAPR11MB3143.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 4:52 PM Van Haaren, Harry
<harry.van.haaren@intel.com> wrote:
> > The rte_service_lcore_reset_all function stops execution of services
> > on all lcores and switches them back from ROLE_SERVICE to ROLE_RTE.
> > However the thread loop for slave lcores (eal_thread_loop) distincts these
> > roles to set lcore state after processing delegated function.
> > It sets WAIT state for ROLE_SERVICE, but FINISHED for ROLE_RTE.
> > So changing the role to RTE before stopping work in slave lcores
> > causes lcores to end in FINISHED state. That is why the rte_eal_lcore_wait
> > must be run after rte_service_lcore_reset_all to bring back lcores to
> > launchable (WAIT) state.
> > This has been fixed in test app and clarified in API documentation.
> >
> > Setting the state to WAIT in rte_service_runner_func is premature
> > as the rte_service_runner_func function is still a part of the lcore
> > function delegated to slave lcore. The state is overwritten anyway in
> > slave lcore thread loop. This premature setting state to WAIT might
> > however cause rte_eal_lcore_wait, that was called by the application,
> > to return before slave lcore thread set the FINISHED state. That's
> > why it is removed from librte_eal rte_service_runner_func function.
Thanks for the explanation and fix.
> >
> > Bugzilla ID: 464
> > Fixes: 21698354c832 ("service: introduce service cores concept")
> > Fixes: f038a81e1c56 ("service: add unit tests")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
Reported-by: Sarosh Arif <sarosh.arif@emumba.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Wojciechowski <l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>
> Acked-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
Applied, thanks Lukasz.
--
David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-08 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20200428012204eucas1p120a84e501d0d64145c21476cd2562f36@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2020-04-28 1:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-04-29 3:11 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-04-29 15:07 ` Phil Yang
2020-04-29 21:32 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-04-30 2:54 ` Phil Yang
2020-04-30 9:06 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-05-08 16:12 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-05-08 17:04 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-05-18 18:25 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-05-18 18:39 ` David Marchand
2020-05-18 18:43 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-05-20 11:40 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-05-20 12:47 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
[not found] ` <CGME20200708133748eucas1p2dbe34d8605d8f618559daee9cbeaa73d@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2020-07-08 13:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-07-08 14:52 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-07-08 17:10 ` David Marchand [this message]
2020-07-08 19:37 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJFAV8xWa6WZy_GAZ2yrY6qrCWbyjGaMWYjLhXUjpDd2QnM+bQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).