DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: "Abdullah Ömer Yamaç" <omer.yamac@ceng.metu.edu.tr>,
	"Kevin Traynor" <ktraynor@redhat.com>,
	"Luca Boccassi" <bluca@debian.org>,
	"Xueming(Steven) Li" <xuemingl@nvidia.com>,
	"Christian Ehrhardt" <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, ferruh.yigit@xilinx.com,
	 Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] eal: update lcore-worker name due to high number of cores
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 11:39:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8xXJ55KB1u3CsJR8z2sB+Z4UA_h-Dh-DENkwmKmx-mPDA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220923070613.697210-1-omer.yamac@ceng.metu.edu.tr>

Hello,

On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 9:06 AM Abdullah Ömer Yamaç
<omer.yamac@ceng.metu.edu.tr> wrote:
>
> In this patch we suggest a new name for lcore-worker.
> In case of more than 99 logical cores, name is truncated
> (length is restricted to 16 characters, including the
> terminating null byte ('\0')) and it makes hard to follow threads.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abdullah Ömer Yamaç <omer.yamac@ceng.metu.edu.tr>
> Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>

- Thanks, good catch.

Some comments though.
What matters is the lcore index, not the core/lcore count.
The commitlog could probably describe this better.

For example, this issue can be triggered with --lcores=0,10@1,100@2
and here we only have three lcores.
$ cat /proc/$(pidof dpdk-testpmd)/task/*/comm
dpdk-testpmd
eal-intr-thread
rte_mp_handle
lcore-worker-10
lcore-worker-10
telemetry-v2
telemetry-v1


And what do you think of following title:
"eal: fix thread names for high order lcores"

Can you update the release notes?


- Question to stable maintainers:
Do you think we should backport this fix?
As you can see below, this change affects EAL thread names, maybe some
users are monitoring them based on the names...


>
> ---
> Cc: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> ---
>  lib/eal/freebsd/eal.c | 2 +-
>  lib/eal/linux/eal.c   | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/eal/freebsd/eal.c b/lib/eal/freebsd/eal.c
> index ee5c929da8..a1bb5363b1 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/freebsd/eal.c
> +++ b/lib/eal/freebsd/eal.c
> @@ -817,7 +817,7 @@ rte_eal_init(int argc, char **argv)
>
>                 /* Set thread_name for aid in debugging. */
>                 snprintf(thread_name, sizeof(thread_name),
> -                               "lcore-worker-%d", i);
> +                               "rte-worker-%d", i);
>                 rte_thread_setname(lcore_config[i].thread_id, thread_name);
>
>                 ret = pthread_setaffinity_np(lcore_config[i].thread_id,
> diff --git a/lib/eal/linux/eal.c b/lib/eal/linux/eal.c
> index 46bf52cef0..9a168b7773 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/linux/eal.c
> +++ b/lib/eal/linux/eal.c
> @@ -1248,7 +1248,7 @@ rte_eal_init(int argc, char **argv)
>
>                 /* Set thread_name for aid in debugging. */
>                 snprintf(thread_name, sizeof(thread_name),
> -                       "lcore-worker-%d", i);
> +                       "rte-worker-%d", i);
>                 ret = rte_thread_setname(lcore_config[i].thread_id,
>                                                 thread_name);
>                 if (ret != 0)
> --
> 2.27.0
>

Merci !

-- 
David Marchand


  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-26  9:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-22 10:18 [PATCH] Update " Abdullah Ömer Yamaç
2022-09-22 10:30 ` [PATCH v2] lib/eal/linux: update " Abdullah Ömer Yamaç
2022-09-22 15:18   ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-09-23  7:06     ` [PATCH v3] eal: " Abdullah Ömer Yamaç
2022-09-26  9:39       ` David Marchand [this message]
2022-09-26  9:56         ` [PATCH v4] eal: fix thread names for high order lcores Abdullah Ömer Yamaç
2022-09-26 10:03         ` [PATCH v5] " Abdullah Ömer Yamaç
2022-09-30  8:52           ` David Marchand
2022-09-26 10:44         ` [PATCH v3] eal: update lcore-worker name due to high number of cores Kevin Traynor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJFAV8xXJ55KB1u3CsJR8z2sB+Z4UA_h-Dh-DENkwmKmx-mPDA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=bluca@debian.org \
    --cc=christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@xilinx.com \
    --cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
    --cc=omer.yamac@ceng.metu.edu.tr \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=xuemingl@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).