DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Sivaprasad Tummala <sivaprasad.tummala@amd.com>
Cc: bruce.richardson@intel.com, konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru,
	dev@dpdk.org,  dpdk-techboard <techboard@dpdk.org>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] config/x86: config support for AMD EPYC processors
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2023 09:50:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8xZhxvZ2A6UHwMY-MKo_BkEq6KbHgKDTOTkuvxeagQ_Cg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230925151027.558546-1-sivaprasad.tummala@amd.com>

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:11 PM Sivaprasad Tummala
<sivaprasad.tummala@amd.com> wrote:
>
> From: Sivaprasad Tummala <Sivaprasad.Tummala@amd.com>
>
> By default, max lcores are limited to 128 for x86 platforms.
> On AMD EPYC processors, this limit needs to be increased to
> leverage all the cores.
>
> The patch adjusts the limit specifically for native compilation
> on AMD EPYC CPUs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sivaprasad Tummala <Sivaprasad.Tummala@amd.com>

This patch is a revamp of
http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/BY5PR12MB3681C3FC6676BC03F0B42CCC96789@BY5PR12MB3681.namprd12.prod.outlook.com/
for which a discussion at techboard is supposed to have taken place.
But I didn't find a trace of it.

One option that had been discussed in the previous thread was to
increase the max number of cores for x86.
I am unclear if this option has been properly evaluated/debatted.

Can the topic be brought again at techboard?

Thanks.

-- 
David Marchand


  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-06  7:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-25 15:10 Sivaprasad Tummala
2023-10-06  7:50 ` David Marchand [this message]
2023-10-16  5:14   ` Tummala, Sivaprasad
2023-10-16  5:20     ` Tummala, Sivaprasad
2023-10-17  9:45       ` Kevin Traynor
2023-10-17 10:27         ` Morten Brørup
2023-11-06 21:05           ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-11-06 22:17             ` Morten Brørup
2023-11-07 13:13               ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-11-07 13:30                 ` Morten Brørup
2023-11-07 14:32                   ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-11-08 12:24                     ` Tummala, Sivaprasad
2023-11-08 13:06                       ` Morten Brørup
2023-11-09 16:43                       ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-10-17 10:58         ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-11-07 12:59 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-11-12 13:48 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-12-20  7:10 Sivaprasad Tummala
2023-12-20  7:27 ` Morten Brørup
2023-12-20  9:22   ` Tummala, Sivaprasad

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJFAV8xZhxvZ2A6UHwMY-MKo_BkEq6KbHgKDTOTkuvxeagQ_Cg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru \
    --cc=sivaprasad.tummala@amd.com \
    --cc=techboard@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).