From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E4FA0524; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 10:02:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 983E9C93C; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 10:02:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16693C93C for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 10:02:38 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1606467757; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Kw8o0keRp3GFdLZM+7evzrK3jwWAPhiLDinBaksLQgc=; b=Dgr7y26BKgnhR/rCdkiUQxAhsUcMD7mhbgik8rS789NfIjFpD/433FjNR5Y7eFH/L/BVui fLsQAvmAvzlDvdlM8JpwkGYYEWO9DOcrUZwOMdF27LqhenHEoeYwvGolB9E31P2S1Lh9GF CMuB56DSuArEg5GKaHZmiqOt1H3iR9c= Received: from mail-vs1-f71.google.com (mail-vs1-f71.google.com [209.85.217.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-177--EmtNNqqOkqEFn7j8lbVfQ-1; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 04:02:34 -0500 X-MC-Unique: -EmtNNqqOkqEFn7j8lbVfQ-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f71.google.com with SMTP id f23so549999vsh.7 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 01:02:34 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Kw8o0keRp3GFdLZM+7evzrK3jwWAPhiLDinBaksLQgc=; b=KjUVIuoM5xiVpmwrw2uN6owwUefXxeBDyqRIE/ydS1b0UpQ7aE730w/OUNoDpO9AOZ 5jcM5cUWBQZKBdJ9OgEFGpgRZxA5rNC52jZVcK2q3T9wxsj3u/zUPJrRhcuRkzlwIoK2 GP5scjh/B9eH4OxCNNSJWtTuYsaCOXpct2H/BzUActMriKZk6ciB3kduslSzeV12R/t/ Jv13pOBWH5isYj5hcL1j5h20Nf+kkBpDa2q9Z2JnFJtddaCr2qHyYQDvfZ9jH551rg0g F+EMfikVb29xr5DEWQGuwSl4CxzvIBOb2NnDFaaIllZ5l495Aomt5+Tu5Xfzkr5Wg92B Hv+g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ooPHb6FINJtzxjh3pYen8PTbRP8JpO6wxhe+SUXm23auTeHcu VTlnrKJvOQv88l6VU0yDmG89+QYMLH0bxSw0PP+RW7Pa+v/VkQDyyukqpbWAUMZb8O6Vm/zLZPl iexhNTp9OSIHA/pWYjP0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:2362:: with SMTP id o2mr4486508vsa.5.1606467753973; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 01:02:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxq6jR5KPZzcXZRyYwpfNU56GdjjryAsYYlV+Ey0Xjcq9sTAe2Z6Ls6DdjEnou/0lp5mbiur/CTBuRbMtSv2Qo= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:2362:: with SMTP id o2mr4486497vsa.5.1606467753732; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 01:02:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201127080903.26817-1-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> <20201127080903.26817-3-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20201127080903.26817-3-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 10:02:22 +0100 Message-ID: To: Bruce Richardson , "Yigit, Ferruh" Cc: Jeff Guo , Haiyue Wang , Alvin Zhang , dev , Honnappa Nagarahalli , nd , Ruifeng Wang , Feifei Wang Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] net/igc: fix gcc build for optimization level 0 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 9:10 AM Ruifeng Wang wrote: > > Gcc build with '-O0' failed for: > ../drivers/net/igc/base/igc_api.c > Assembler messages: > 29: Error: selected processor does not support `casp x0,x1,x2,x3,[x4]' > 82: Error: selected processor does not support `caspa x0,x1,x2,x3,[x4]' > 135: Error: selected processor does not support `caspl x0,x1,x2,x3,[x4]' > 188: Error: selected processor does not support `caspal x0,x1,x2,x3,[x4]' > > This is due to c_args not been passed to meson. > > Fixes: 8cb7c57d9b3c ("net/igc: support device initialization") > Cc: alvinx.zhang@intel.com > > Reported-by: Feifei Wang > Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Wang I did not get to reproduce it yet (get an error on first patch...). The patch looks fine but I fear some compilation problems since a lot of base drivers filter cflags. Still waiting for CI results... Bruce,Ferruh, Wdyt? -- David Marchand