From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B434A0519; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 17:38:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D19EE1DC50; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 17:38:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 422A81DC4D for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 17:38:50 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1593790729; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1sWDWGjxhbsPfDtlZWQflNAM9G9b6Ci+6as2vbhhpT0=; b=H319tYL1PnBaMwsNWYHRyrnd1f90WNxNTEuSIPKrzjqzXQzy5TTtK5FK0b2CTT2F1QFDr3 VR93Nic981YLFLINKhRVyejRRjIDwuyVqdWqUiE4xnXeF/rC+imoXDo+qyfIZ494dlb3BY POO8J3ICNaCLqI1/ga9UVsJ0E33sFd4= Received: from mail-ua1-f69.google.com (mail-ua1-f69.google.com [209.85.222.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-417-i4sdk69QPCGvNgyCJkZtGA-1; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 11:38:46 -0400 X-MC-Unique: i4sdk69QPCGvNgyCJkZtGA-1 Received: by mail-ua1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 14so5715343uac.8 for ; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 08:38:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1sWDWGjxhbsPfDtlZWQflNAM9G9b6Ci+6as2vbhhpT0=; b=t/oyaA6N8NO6TFUYI33U6llv1O8DdLbO1Jy7qhFBbQ3mAiS/TaiiZPjZU3t42MkRcH ieP+AZj62Ral1hlS1tShsJJCZjCFWwlwGeS55sNNpOz8RYfXy3l4UaL2ccZmlYkjgVEK c+fyBTS3xdJN/lOeKodoib5A6VWtYG8bBnq8Qeij5a7QUyAGpVtk/dN3R5iUlGzKogzT VnVTRMNhWoLBSe0YkM1m2jH+EC856LcVesQL3dutKS0tVQmrQVG9n260xlPxWqMH1C35 EOYgDUH5LpieGJAGIV4ggs7HgBIamnmIrnEZLqe5ShDVgkiS9fEaLC+j2P//H0sqUZPp 258g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532XMfaTzuBcEmsWEn916pw7qOQ9ufKoXGrq/lBBoDv9b01TTZMD MEOITxzGSBxEG3G6AmZtvZeSVzYdLMlvG5vMWd5jiq0ddvdFf1r0YAJRvxGGx/PCyzaMjHx0b4b vmJLfBOqMUFAK33B2Wg0= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:316:: with SMTP id 22mr27581236uat.41.1593790725940; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 08:38:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwsrq0mqNh76T9CzwslSqJn2K65F06lAToGDCHlSAcWPMjqqbnxsoH0p+Kq/OUmLuu7cNDI4v+heE/ur0qJYLc= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:316:: with SMTP id 22mr27581217uat.41.1593790725715; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 08:38:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1591871178-12542-1-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <1591871178-12542-1-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com> From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 17:38:34 +0200 Message-ID: To: Phil Yang Cc: dev , Olivier Matz , David Christensen , Honnappa Nagarahalli , "Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)" , nd Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: use c11 atomics for refcnt operations X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 12:26 PM Phil Yang wrote: > > Use c11 atomics with explicit ordering instead of rte_atomic ops which > enforce unnecessary barriers on aarch64. > > Signed-off-by: Phil Yang > Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang I did not look at the details, but this patch is refused by the ABI check in Travis. -- David Marchand