From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144F4A0C43; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 09:46:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F13BC40683; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 09:46:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6458540141 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 09:46:49 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1634543208; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=I+/s0hGYW59munic+kgAm/kl1eYTS5v4cIc41/SGOy4=; b=Ak9hmsSFJCbFW8GCqEjydnntU7kvbddk0KOeJtYjBsA0gKOZEsdu0VEOj5D/mHYu+toDEL gk/bQoajZnCsv2NbaLUkOpcNbW7AmK/b1YGm4jeFrEbUtPq+bCwBZTQdaNj8Ct3EWBy0PN 0j5oORk1tB/U3Tkr6zskFhy8nCuWkpo= Received: from mail-lf1-f69.google.com (mail-lf1-f69.google.com [209.85.167.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-259-ekQqlTr9NxeVhpN8Avj0Xg-1; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 03:46:41 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ekQqlTr9NxeVhpN8Avj0Xg-1 Received: by mail-lf1-f69.google.com with SMTP id x33-20020a0565123fa100b003fcfd99073dso9671618lfa.6 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 00:46:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=I+/s0hGYW59munic+kgAm/kl1eYTS5v4cIc41/SGOy4=; b=tEfg8VOJM1Lv1cnNskI59SfouNHl5ltIbd8ZvpWtfdIv++HXLufGaAYMVSEmfDUcoX 9FsTf/0DztTuJeKWKqtvubbehgWy3W7Er5HIhxDZCzVNVfEQQXCBv3L2PDGa3y9++9Fo xzvTLyFUS7dIp6+J0VywM4o4X80kVZPsrlMB83qYn6FyLR91jt/vS75Ue31VmIBz+m5e qs8tppUdjwmZ1FIDShCdVDiTUJvzKcpVQW2nK8Xs7ufiXYLO5PLN65l9ntKqNSNrVlUB wzKDQ69sB49tQHRp9LR0qfEMhVMVFUvVVmyjGJ3IGnPLykNXjdWG0n8BAa8ayw2jztrN QriQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5332/HuwK5uaMolWKnLzJcTYFcToE8QAcyIIdnu/RVt7LQpHZT4s bsyAh0r0RYfK3TBNpXvOkcbe/4+mrUCLzeigxy76rFTqCX1X+duQApNPgsVyyauMrCk2i096oMt EMc8eJ0rwo5moyT+zNYQ= X-Received: by 2002:a19:c514:: with SMTP id w20mr24034270lfe.265.1634543200431; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 00:46:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxIfC/YffScS80qn9pn7Vpo/2XVLJuLtl6l4ds27Fc1INusY3zsyhEpRa+h4QcYdeKsWdP/kD/6MyTUcGTJGqo= X-Received: by 2002:a19:c514:: with SMTP id w20mr24034246lfe.265.1634543200240; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 00:46:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 09:46:28 +0200 Message-ID: To: Akhil Goyal Cc: Vidya Sagar Velumuri , dev , "Zhang, Roy Fan" , "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [Bug 828] [dpdk-21.11] zuc unit test is failing X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 8:05 PM Akhil Goyal wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 10:02 AM wrote: > > > > > > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D828 > > > > > > Bug ID: 828 > > > Summary: [dpdk-21.11] zuc unit test is failing > > > Product: DPDK > > > Version: 21.11 > > > Hardware: All > > > OS: Linux > > > Status: UNCONFIRMED > > > Severity: normal > > > Priority: Normal > > > Component: cryptodev > > > Assignee: dev@dpdk.org > > > Reporter: varalakshmi.s@intel.com > > > Target Milestone: --- > > > > I could not assign this bug to you in bz, can you have a look? > > Thanks. > > > Can somebody from Intel look into this? > We don=E2=80=99t have intel-ipsec-mb library access, so cannot reproduce = the issue. I see Intel reply on the issue so we are probably good. However, on access to intel-ipsec-mb topic, sources are available on github= . Compiling is relatively easy (this is what I did in the past when checking compilation) if your linux distributions does not package it, but some do: https://pkgs.org/search/?q=3Dintel-ipsec-mb --=20 David Marchand