From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE867A2EDB
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Wed,  2 Oct 2019 10:15:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B59C81B9A9;
	Wed,  2 Oct 2019 10:15:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-1.mimecast.com
 [205.139.110.61]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AFCD1B94D
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed,  2 Oct 2019 10:15:49 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
 s=mimecast20190719; t=1570004148;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
 bh=Gj+XdkCtKRrN9n2XxPYX8ASX0cF8h9FlR4CR54RSuTM=;
 b=gfA9o3D9gk9Ic++mXAXg9EvOiyzcttyOTeiCWklyfhsqsNzDcNAUCqeuznusojB0YVGQp3
 70JzukNKsnuL0J8zaqaSOcurxHKbVguQIbhefxbHVN900JPDs+pzmAVhnCwZpOgXTCo2W/
 UuahS208Lmsa0OunPsPR8BosBY1lDbA=
Received: from mail-vk1-f200.google.com (mail-vk1-f200.google.com
 [209.85.221.200]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id
 us-mta-304-87f4j8IgO0mwjvviSvI1Xg-1; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 04:15:46 -0400
Received: by mail-vk1-f200.google.com with SMTP id a7so9264630vkg.2
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 01:15:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=A1gEFRZoOtInVNqCgj9hb80Cp5IPvdsIt6fSa0g/C1I=;
 b=qrK0+qcL39aUKDvWd39nurEkc2bo2RhAXrNHPNfbouSAtRnGUDRauHRg1GSk7cT4ZU
 Yw6Y3XlClWETDHhjDk+OXUnaebXWj+ciE6gtrcTFbOFEOt1/mdjIaxKGhfHjQHj1ItcV
 06OFHIWdb2yonQUmz/Vi0SwZ714FwaZ5065DU5Xi6of58YNjMZ82xbJWD0HXrcX+ZhSS
 HoYH4av5krNp7z/VKZhHD0aZ5FE7rj3VyJgHtgc7iZZkNXDAjvDTbA8mH2tJBIJUGAQB
 ost96PgdTwoOJw07RiNwzgsYg9Hgq4vf3JZ5LiVULBWpGk1/SKbWQuEVlSI+jtb9pJtS
 EepQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXw+Q2W2JKxQR7Ly5D6sHXJJMSZrCr/oWQW1YcYtBPEEf7yupUQ
 d0/Lxhbo94k1Zg0MVh2AHhphZVQ+S1aVgZOsJV28EzdmST1z+TfX7FBuEY009Qh5tV/lzW2GK9b
 5SrOsjctf7ctbd2uDNHo=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:be15:: with SMTP id x21mr1105915vsq.141.1570004145636; 
 Wed, 02 Oct 2019 01:15:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwEhjcLzTOAJBdDRfjdNyEK+52/JW6Y+W9a29p/4VtUfPmTsZCn6hIyUnvxC7kbBp4qMlL0U5xQMdDUB4YUoR8=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:be15:: with SMTP id x21mr1105912vsq.141.1570004145324; 
 Wed, 02 Oct 2019 01:15:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190925161013.3656-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190925161013.3656-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 10:15:34 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8xdaE5bFTOXz2qRhkL5kd_HR3vTACkbpNLa0QfgQ2fEHA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>
X-MC-Unique: 87f4j8IgO0mwjvviSvI1Xg-1
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7] eal: make lcore_config private
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Thanks for working on this.

On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 6:10 PM Stephen Hemminger
<stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
>
> The internal structure of lcore_config is no longer be part of
> visible API/ABI. Make it private to EAL.
>
> Rearrange and resize the fields in the structure so it takes
> less memory (and cache footprint).

This patch is missing the release notes update.


>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> ---
> v7 - add eal_private.h to windows
>
>  lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_launch.c |  2 ++
>  lib/librte_eal/common/eal_private.h       | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_lcore.h | 24 -----------------------
>  lib/librte_eal/common/rte_service.c       |  2 ++
>  lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map        |  1 -
>  lib/librte_eal/windows/eal/eal_thread.c   |  1 +
>  6 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_launch.c b/lib/librte_eal/c=
ommon/eal_common_launch.c
> index fe0ba3f0d617..cf52d717f68e 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_launch.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_launch.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
>  #include <rte_per_lcore.h>
>  #include <rte_lcore.h>
>
> +#include "eal_private.h"
> +
>  /*
>   * Wait until a lcore finished its job.
>   */
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_private.h b/lib/librte_eal/common/=
eal_private.h
> index 798ede553b21..25e80547904f 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_private.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_private.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,28 @@
>  #include <stdio.h>
>
>  #include <rte_dev.h>
> +#include <rte_lcore.h>
> +
> +/**
> + * Structure storing internal configuration (per-lcore)
> + */
> +struct lcore_config {
> +       uint32_t core_id;      /**< core number on socket for this lcore =
*/
> +       uint32_t core_index;   /**< relative index, starting from 0 */
> +       uint16_t socket_id;    /**< physical socket id for this lcore */
> +       uint8_t core_role;         /**< role of core eg: OFF, RTE, SERVIC=
E */
> +       uint8_t detected;          /**< true if lcore was detected */
> +       volatile enum rte_lcore_state_t state; /**< lcore state */
> +       rte_cpuset_t cpuset;       /**< cpu set which the lcore affinity =
to */
> +       pthread_t thread_id;       /**< pthread identifier */
> +       int pipe_master2slave[2];  /**< communication pipe with master */
> +       int pipe_slave2master[2];  /**< communication pipe with master */
> +       lcore_function_t * volatile f;         /**< function to call */
> +       void * volatile arg;       /**< argument of function */
> +       volatile int ret;          /**< return value of function */
> +};
> +
> +extern struct lcore_config lcore_config[RTE_MAX_LCORE];

Everything but cpuset can fit in a cache line.
You could just move the cpuset field at the end of the structure and
change detected to uint8_t.
This gives the following layout:

struct lcore_config {
    pthread_t                  thread_id;            /*     0     8 */
    int                        pipe_master2slave[2]; /*     8     8 */
    int                        pipe_slave2master[2]; /*    16     8 */
    volatile lcore_function_t *  f;                  /*    24     8 */
    volatile void *            arg;                  /*    32     8 */
    volatile int               ret;                  /*    40     4 */
    volatile enum rte_lcore_state_t  state;          /*    44     4 */
    unsigned int               socket_id;            /*    48     4 */
    unsigned int               core_id;              /*    52     4 */
    int                        core_index;           /*    56     4 */
    uint8_t                    detected;             /*    60     1 */
    uint8_t                    core_role;            /*    61     1 */

    /* XXX 2 bytes hole, try to pack */

    /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */
    rte_cpuset_t               cpuset;               /*    64   128 */
    /* --- cacheline 3 boundary (192 bytes) --- */

    /* size: 192, cachelines: 3, members: 13 */
    /* sum members: 190, holes: 1, sum holes: 2 */
};

The resulting structure is only two bytes bigger than your proposal
and does not touch existing integer types (avoiding the risk of some
integer conversion on socket_id for example).


--=20
David Marchand