From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D6F45D6D; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:29:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D822140687; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:29:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5CB740687 for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:29:51 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1732652991; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sGy4+ncX2iK3/pLUu8g/qbbL4cSPVfK26WVRfLPr9BY=; b=cJumNusyOkpQMwOuL9AmErXcbsEOjr93JgOBgniBDfDLTfVBd5kfJzq9M2VnDj5R1zIrxD vYF389AIbfyJRl9xKWAK+J3bAvWr9djQuVfKinKuznqBQCA6vsK8FBf8rPkj3fvq1panVb Kh+h2CMOnqDvE6n9/7tsrCuQojMI2lk= Received: from mail-lf1-f71.google.com (mail-lf1-f71.google.com [209.85.167.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-527-O3YfVsg0OaCJTFdH3xWqqg-1; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 15:29:47 -0500 X-MC-Unique: O3YfVsg0OaCJTFdH3xWqqg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: O3YfVsg0OaCJTFdH3xWqqg Received: by mail-lf1-f71.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-53de344c5cbso55144e87.1 for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 12:29:46 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1732652985; x=1733257785; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=sGy4+ncX2iK3/pLUu8g/qbbL4cSPVfK26WVRfLPr9BY=; b=ligDnCCck0eHLOACNGGklasQI93Mkpmff0fQVbFek4A2kRH+ZloJqpa5mYnz/G0AmI MGxI714V0V9gs8rVTGNcsQjCFQG6uh9Cd6/1WKkd+1cZ1k47BajamOrArcKkxuUYOv9c NjazvPyFS3MiS0jOcLi80BiQHTiZXSBsy9RfxcjamFL81mJ+y57LZcfftv+WeckDlCrk n3vTx314BIQkWD1JT3YlO36YlQFkSs2KAWwghKv6lzl81zuvjtFMNYZyilHW0rWCI5jn +HGlWq+Qc2zaxjhLV630VLdF1zvUL91DA783DzuYL4jKFRPdLSsqHbaOJC6E/rzZEUnT 1oig== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXCXVrP+4k1+jeyHwo0fkgbmK6LqtGk4QmMKiWDOd6uUaeBpicqZ7gpZf/t/5Dnj3PQ1mk=@dpdk.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxt//6T7bHWuM6t+ZoodtnWHGqQJJB3sma2CWvua2ik0ZYgpRfq Au6myy0eKESgwlZO9rnRTt+eemIBxrKM2iVUzFWxKStSjqbs0frQ4qvycQT+blcq3bDq22OVt3V Fr5cABkNoXaaeUCAZpSQSIbd2C2N0LJ/qWkABuIdoU2/3XRnGS5zDF4sHga58/echdHxPcqPMKy 6A9SXTWSyU0k9YREM= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctuJkJUnUfbeoyWgms5CExgEpntYbLlBIS9tgH2zMvFdiIAmYbXStqUaabNJr7 MUIccan58BvTdSnXsV8kZuZuOYaVfQm7e4w== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:456f:0:b0:53d:f042:c66c with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-53df042c7b0mr64557e87.23.1732652985220; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 12:29:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHlySp7OxPqG941Os+ezzwPjxhlZcwLwZjhfisplYUpTkjo259blhIz+RH6X8zghVPNFsiScydYGMunv+fs/Ms= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:456f:0:b0:53d:f042:c66c with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-53df042c7b0mr64542e87.23.1732652984376; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 12:29:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:29:33 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: raise fast test timeout to 60s on RISC-V To: Eric Long Cc: Thomas Monjalon , dev@dpdk.org X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: JHMYQ-7DhqyYOzqVNJjvcmh3mZ3zKxQ5_sm2avuFzqo_1732652985 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Sat, Nov 23, 2024 at 4:00=E2=80=AFPM Eric Long wrote: > > Current RISC-V hardware (e.g. HiFive Unmatched) is still way too slow > compared to other architectures' counterparts. On the most powerful > RISC-V CPU available (SG2042), DPDK still fails with 4 timeouts: > > ``` > Summary of Failures: > > 23/77 DPDK:fast-tests / eventdev_selftest_sw TIMEOUT > 10.06s killed by signal 15 SIGTERM > 56/77 DPDK:fast-tests / rib6_autotest TIMEOUT > 10.04s > 64/77 DPDK:fast-tests / spinlock_autotest TIMEOUT > 10.06s killed by signal 15 SIGTERM > 66/77 DPDK:fast-tests / table_autotest TIMEOUT > 11.28s killed by signal 15 SIGTERM > ``` > > On HiFive Unmatched, the longest test takes 53 seconds: > > ``` > 37/77 DPDK:fast-tests / lpm6_autotest OK > 53.29s > ``` > > Raising timeout to 60s on RISC-V target will help test effectiveness > on it. You can extend the timeout via the multiplier option (default timeout of 10s * multiplier). So in your case: $ meson test -C --suite fast-tests -t 6 --=20 David Marchand