Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 21.11 v2 0/3] octeontx build only on 64-bit Linux

[David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 3:52 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
>
> This is a reorg of the patches from Pavan.
> It has been discussed that it should wait for DPDK 21.11
> for ABI compatibility reason.
>
> Pavan Nikhilesh (3):
>   net/thunderx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux
>   common/octeontx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux
>   common/octeontx2: enable build only on 64-bit Linux
>
>  drivers/common/octeontx/meson.build   |  6 ++++++
>  drivers/common/octeontx2/meson.build  |  4 ++--
>  drivers/compress/octeontx/meson.build |  6 ++++++
>  drivers/crypto/octeontx/meson.build   |  7 +++++--
>  drivers/event/octeontx/meson.build    |  6 ++++++
>  drivers/event/octeontx2/meson.build   |  4 ++--
>  drivers/mempool/octeontx/meson.build  |  5 +++--
>  drivers/mempool/octeontx2/meson.build |  9 ++-------
>  drivers/net/octeontx/meson.build      |  4 ++--
>  drivers/net/octeontx2/meson.build     | 10 ++--------
>  drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build      |  4 ++--
>  drivers/raw/octeontx2_dma/meson.build | 10 ++++++----
>  12 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

There were a couple of cleanups (indent etc..) and changes in meson files.
This series does not apply cleanly on the main branch.
Could you rebase it?

I noticed that the net/cnxk driver does not have this check, but it is
disabled anyway since it depends on common/cnxk.
Is it worth adding the check for consistency?


-- 
David Marchand