From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A50A0548; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 10:47:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8925F40DF5; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 10:47:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AAE34014E for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 10:47:11 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1629190031; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=bDZcj9jAFLHQfHREXGbKR4OUm1KjqhEraguMbZ42aXw=; b=caNgQmoxj393o9XmN2LzxE6IdMEdhxf5P5Wg5svkq7kFUt0xAKNNZuAPUtEhJB7tfR1GPO FuUXqcp9BroCTEX1vN7KYgLFWehJA8xVehze6hKTPIv5MeF1Mg/Uk/Vr0MHKE7BXWLvvzn PWaLzs8mZybcR8NkA/dBOqPI0j63S7E= Received: from mail-vs1-f69.google.com (mail-vs1-f69.google.com [209.85.217.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-581-NC3EM7MpPIOPXLFKOOM70A-1; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 04:46:25 -0400 X-MC-Unique: NC3EM7MpPIOPXLFKOOM70A-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f69.google.com with SMTP id i186-20020a6722c30000b02902bc73413510so3335735vsi.10 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 01:46:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bDZcj9jAFLHQfHREXGbKR4OUm1KjqhEraguMbZ42aXw=; b=aZHxMRy3Srrz+eGLTAeTdSi8evz8pyFhpyJOv6/AZeJN1W4PFhi4Qwq9f7vKOnaiwu siJEcYf0L9t+BQLINiuG3LEP1aS/6Nbzfh/jtYyB+4wUgbYclQrf6vX64MgDDAT/Tphi 8hcRRdRqbXI2+Ud+gFdWiuMPkOyRzbxFltqByI9OhnugLcG6oq3/nuonwGzZs/gHdw+q jLNx8p1nW4/bSwbm6oj5+hFyCbMbb74Pp/z1UvIxsrsqFKlfD32RnaCrE4AaAlMoDXuU i0sRH57X7kZyHOwedPvgl77gH2CUbc78lCxEvQ/Qe8Dx4+oJZz4NTVVHeG8UaIpZG23N s1hg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532AyYEbK5EwKauucOaVKGo1Bs4MMttWZAA2GDgfeDvdWK4fLUfv ux5y4LGFlYipUOG+LaksrHpBNiuSJ6ZAeoDrh+9UJpofKB7XyQ/jZddsYy9lJ/ETQibt/LzWBO0 DlB14rDdbRxR7aJlaEfE= X-Received: by 2002:ac5:ccf0:: with SMTP id k16mr1750835vkn.9.1629189985468; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 01:46:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx2MgumY8uz8PfnhUW+LMQrs72y3UgTEOT57gpefoeZYU7BEKM2mNKWkifF8l7UGinLjxj/s7i9n3imIeSMSxs= X-Received: by 2002:ac5:ccf0:: with SMTP id k16mr1750829vkn.9.1629189985255; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 01:46:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210225170238.15581-1-pbhagavatula@marvell.com> <20210325145209.2000195-1-thomas@monjalon.net> In-Reply-To: <20210325145209.2000195-1-thomas@monjalon.net> From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 10:46:14 +0200 Message-ID: To: Pavan Nikhilesh Cc: dev , Thomas Monjalon , Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 21.11 v2 0/3] octeontx build only on 64-bit Linux X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 3:52 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > This is a reorg of the patches from Pavan. > It has been discussed that it should wait for DPDK 21.11 > for ABI compatibility reason. > > Pavan Nikhilesh (3): > net/thunderx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux > common/octeontx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux > common/octeontx2: enable build only on 64-bit Linux > > drivers/common/octeontx/meson.build | 6 ++++++ > drivers/common/octeontx2/meson.build | 4 ++-- > drivers/compress/octeontx/meson.build | 6 ++++++ > drivers/crypto/octeontx/meson.build | 7 +++++-- > drivers/event/octeontx/meson.build | 6 ++++++ > drivers/event/octeontx2/meson.build | 4 ++-- > drivers/mempool/octeontx/meson.build | 5 +++-- > drivers/mempool/octeontx2/meson.build | 9 ++------- > drivers/net/octeontx/meson.build | 4 ++-- > drivers/net/octeontx2/meson.build | 10 ++-------- > drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build | 4 ++-- > drivers/raw/octeontx2_dma/meson.build | 10 ++++++---- > 12 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) There were a couple of cleanups (indent etc..) and changes in meson files. This series does not apply cleanly on the main branch. Could you rebase it? I noticed that the net/cnxk driver does not have this check, but it is disabled anyway since it depends on common/cnxk. Is it worth adding the check for consistency? -- David Marchand