From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B60A00C3; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 09:18:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE5B40691; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 09:18:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44744068E for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 09:18:16 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1650957496; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Wkt81A59N1jIH5sF+ZBBo2GugYn46jYPTO37pZ2A0Yg=; b=WzvUj2EXxHTu3qWz6z7fbEuhT+mDfJi4wBMYSHOGSQGg+LTOvpgIFt55m3iG9zSJDH/pD4 hrFwRbjQDY5JTKC0psMvxs4IucLpP7Fm1XX5aURCWqWDYpNz3LxAR4PkkhqB7mHM083nO9 DTF4NalrG3C4mwmUnq2XQkp+aODDBwA= Received: from mail-lj1-f198.google.com (mail-lj1-f198.google.com [209.85.208.198]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-385-euxDS_oiMDCvWvg02pGwvg-1; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 03:18:15 -0400 X-MC-Unique: euxDS_oiMDCvWvg02pGwvg-1 Received: by mail-lj1-f198.google.com with SMTP id l26-20020a2e99da000000b0024f02d881cdso1734788ljj.6 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 00:18:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Wkt81A59N1jIH5sF+ZBBo2GugYn46jYPTO37pZ2A0Yg=; b=2frZ0wD22LJt0O3s3buB9aQBWD5+Z1IKb7QKzgxz+CilJ1Y+k3qQNzywot53MTZ3YZ LOe2kDp7XDg5YFJcPflD536wMYyNWFujvNfn6C0VPtqWBunTukk66h6QB15barzZll5C Y53cLKDsO445QNKj9uGFMxdAw4bCJUqelClD/j2x2u+iSBEvJS7p1FjE3GcGVBk5zHgb mXwG6bYctRQpXEke5kVSnoixMzdG1vq0Kb8z0Uk8fD2NBF01MA50+aabjshrS1nKkeOK 0VULpFV/bniyZKZIgW2kEvVhHn1LD7/HoGx4/chf8MVUGT2t6KeWtUS1pm8NKYdNyicb BmBw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532PiG+HNu5EjleAuHCIrM6qccz2HFpAgqOJuQVsCQ2sqWvUeidj RK3OtKbPcG478kwlxbihBdffusFXKrmpNxmqH6DPEH2VKP+lO/QzRMd/IpsRg8pcOTCGjFo3Ke0 NmXuesNNVaYttiloULWA= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9d90:0:b0:24f:224:8dfa with SMTP id c16-20020a2e9d90000000b0024f02248dfamr10445315ljj.46.1650957493480; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 00:18:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz8TDfPSfM41+lz8jL+x1b4CS+xj1g3D3A49wFjTrIPSuLiv3NwAd8/n3gKlgq5jmxnLxKOLhXcnUWfMbKZ8RQ= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9d90:0:b0:24f:224:8dfa with SMTP id c16-20020a2e9d90000000b0024f02248dfamr10445307ljj.46.1650957493209; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 00:18:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220426070916.532-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20220426070916.532-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 09:18:01 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] ci: do not dump error logs in GHA containers To: dev Cc: Aaron Conole , Michael Santana Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 9:09 AM David Marchand wrote: > > On error, the build logs are displayed in GHA console and logs unless > the GITHUB_WORKFLOW env variable is set. > However, containers in GHA do not automatically inherit this variable. > We could pass this variable in the container environment, but in the > end, dumping those logs is only for Travis which we don't really care > about anymore. > > Let's make the linux-build.sh more generic and dump logs from Travis > yaml itself. > > Fixes: b35c4b0aa2bc ("ci: add Fedora 35 container in GHA") > > Signed-off-by: David Marchand TBH, I did not test Travis by lack of interest (plus I don't want to be bothered with their ui / credit stuff). We could consider dropping Travis in the near future. Opinions? -- David Marchand