From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF9AA0C49; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:43:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F8F54067A; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:43:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9706E40140 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:43:21 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1623743000; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=jc8ucJtsvgM00JBHVB+FvculA82VCa0E1s1jrldmOlA=; b=Ff/8UjFrMpopKo1xnGWisQrST+VUgpPOfhzvgAVceb2AJAeNaz/qGbllmShTXQckn4QvCi IDeNiRmh6B4YX2qgM6DSWHxQvjkolU6hABp1wBKRTy72A/EeidKjZVTkmnTKp/goCb7DYY wAQtsedoOpYtIfd+3nyjJ+Gh3Qw5A+A= Received: from mail-vk1-f198.google.com (mail-vk1-f198.google.com [209.85.221.198]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-566-hAcX2n8EN_2QpeHv6-4ZBg-1; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 03:43:17 -0400 X-MC-Unique: hAcX2n8EN_2QpeHv6-4ZBg-1 Received: by mail-vk1-f198.google.com with SMTP id g198-20020a1f20cf0000b029023d152b0cdeso2374279vkg.19 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 00:43:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jc8ucJtsvgM00JBHVB+FvculA82VCa0E1s1jrldmOlA=; b=GgcCnPU7445M7rutLP0/obdDPdR+Fx92dbwbUcEfsA5Y2WhujTqsPZ+nBpetKVajni 6q4mU2vdsgEU8sD/qkCRuPtQWTBlkrMo+NdXJ9FD9j4VnW9XAwmuDvfELqWwSvRg7xzl xDlLjEmFxab9Z7JqupMmzwql0/FrMrlVVoBzCn6DSFR9D9U+wn4xTztUzDQZfh+2DaWV 3atzcJPBr30gG9DNb2pzu+EsO4U6FlOaX84Od6IOh/cxmwni30jZCStqnCV3hj8xel+2 t0GAzwl3LnepJcWHo86fIo4Ljt7VQhqHDhv7FevuSuHLADssQSNKn7+SRxgzgPPLzmP8 C9HA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Xmk2GZSOAVEvj67Tqxf5Q7eKj2cMi9mKJ4CfwXxk5twkxwBwl yjMh+4OY1+EIlgnCMx1nsN+16DTpLVpXU9Js5YLevNhrUjB+/MnfXMVXCbVfwbOgdNuNcyhCNcc h0/CB4p2Xys/uSes0bI8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:243c:: with SMTP id l28mr3548526vsi.27.1623742997115; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 00:43:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzUpFdTfAfhxyQyLGa+pbw8mDj83MWeaOdqbarQLc5ZXTYDA5/Ut0+UQj6ZjcCEUFF7T6xhYCNu5NuBvMgHvmU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:243c:: with SMTP id l28mr3548515vsi.27.1623742996877; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 00:43:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:43:05 +0200 Message-ID: To: Owen Hilyard Cc: dev , dpdklab , Gaetan Rivet , Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran , Aaron Conole Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Memory leak in rte_pci_scan X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Owen, On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 10:42 PM Owen Hilyard wrote: > > From what I've seen so far, that fixes the PCI leak. That just leaves a few other places. I'll try to get the complete list to you tomorrow, since running the full set of unit tests takes quite a few hours when ASAN is involved. Ok, thanks for the test. I'll send a patch on the pci bus. Just odd that it tooks hours in your case. On my f32 system, it took 3/4 minutes. It is probably worth looking why the difference. We can't have asan enabled at UNH otherwise. -- David Marchand