DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, mb@smartsharesystems.com, roretzla@linux.microsoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eal/x86: fix build on systems with WAITPKG support
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 09:08:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8y4H0KDv88UO4zfjkvuiBxxjudYdgwX4qXnhYYu2ijitw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230825152850.1107690-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com>

Hello Bruce,

On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 5:29 PM Bruce Richardson
<bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:
>
> When doing a build for a system with WAITPKG support and a modern
> compiler, we get build errors for the "_umonitor" intrinsic, due to the
> casting away of the "volatile" on the parameter.
>
> ../lib/eal/x86/rte_power_intrinsics.c: In function 'rte_power_monitor':
> ../lib/eal/x86/rte_power_intrinsics.c:113:22: error: passing argument 1
> of '_umonitor' discards 'volatile' qualifier from pointer target type
> [-Werror=discarded-qualifiers]
>   113 |         _umonitor(pmc->addr);
>         |                   ~~~^~~~~~
>
> We can avoid this issue by using RTE_PTR_ADD(..., 0) to cast the pointer
> through "uintptr_t" and thereby remove the volatile without warning.
> We also ensure comments are correct for each leg of the
> ifdef..else..endif block.
>
> Fixes: 60943c04f3bc ("eal/x86: use intrinsics for power management")
> Cc: roretzla@linux.microsoft.com
>
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>

I'm looking for a system with WAITPKG in the RH lab.. so far, no luck.
Do you have a way to force-reproduce this issue? Like some compiler
options forcing support?


-- 
David Marchand


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-28  7:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-25 15:28 Bruce Richardson
2023-08-25 16:07 ` Morten Brørup
2023-08-28  7:08 ` David Marchand [this message]
2023-08-28  8:05   ` David Marchand
2023-08-28  9:29 ` David Marchand
2023-08-28 10:29   ` Bruce Richardson
2023-08-28 10:42     ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-08-28 11:03       ` Bruce Richardson
2023-08-28 14:31         ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-08-28 15:56         ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-28 10:39 ` [PATCH v2] " Bruce Richardson
2023-08-28 14:39   ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJFAV8y4H0KDv88UO4zfjkvuiBxxjudYdgwX4qXnhYYu2ijitw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).