From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12110A32A8 for ; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 18:08:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 200741BF6C; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 18:08:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0297D1BF65 for ; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 18:08:12 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1572106092; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=rYUzBBK6p5vObqgdSQ8AEEjjVTgeyo0DYx/C34pwnUo=; b=b4FXnPA3ShWrPmG4WG3r9WSc4I1fzBvsOxgaWFF+1fE07gV43kQzdluRobf72GWKP/tjMw NVtrhn6ByR8jWqK+zwIVI/VqCX6fHDws6LioPjYlIrzugnU9huRWoKP8lB/LWsYeLfnoTm fariMq7qzZQL6YMNfwPhae3pJdQ2084= Received: from mail-vk1-f200.google.com (mail-vk1-f200.google.com [209.85.221.200]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-27-mx07E2Z6Nm2_jH8eYGVTbQ-1; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 12:08:10 -0400 Received: by mail-vk1-f200.google.com with SMTP id b141so2417810vkf.15 for ; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 09:08:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fzf7gw8Hqlpwax7WBkh1nmrVLGu4DPf/7a+bZ6c9J1E=; b=kWcVuODQ+FGOKHOSWKjlgEtLGZ9GyXbH7AFClgThZxC+CkNBniJGf/YQVTFHddIh3l Xm3ALRBHvLWy34vZ+walx+kXONsJfwkNBU4o1I0lcIVitN8Q6esEORMys+5TS7sks1oZ NjldXLVin9Kwq+OKK8bB7e8c9H0T+kVjV6miNqH+GVJh9Zwl0dWMJrrFzPm14RwwuwQa 8Va9a8mYIna1QLy5EW6NxZWMa350gOiZg6p/HGMMHPFZ+mdF1yMDCyAUxcW2xyRCvJ7h uQxO0zhXC9LabvtaH67ihh+hhdaU7/80FpuDNxEcM0TbDbCCKLJkXAH1/GPUViTg6cF/ oAMg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXa+pDBzZLoKTahh0Np/PnQjyCuMz+5RTDCFdYs2/5tt/cOnjPx p0o/FLfDsT5F/tsGILT+SAHyOz6foAz6mZyTUFyh1ihc/N0XE/TY6DL4TcUHreY1PIpZDr1itVm WsyCThKc0c+HoZZxQrRI= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:304e:: with SMTP id x14mr4616132ual.41.1572106090129; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 09:08:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyrE6GwGY9CqPxM2+kCMadWM1Nczfq3uqxMdiQ+XOv7FhiN42xEsMO+wI5jLLDDfec5cZEuM4rA1S/en5FAXKA= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:304e:: with SMTP id x14mr4616117ual.41.1572106089757; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 09:08:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201910251937435842069@zte.com.cn> <930ae82b-bb2f-7b70-317a-d801dca4fda6@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <930ae82b-bb2f-7b70-317a-d801dca4fda6@intel.com> From: David Marchand Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2019 18:07:58 +0200 Message-ID: To: Li Han Cc: Thomas Monjalon , dev , "Burakov, Anatoly" X-MC-Unique: mx07E2Z6Nm2_jH8eYGVTbQ-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] lib/librte_eal/linuxapp: fix runtime configmmap issue X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 2:20 PM Burakov, Anatoly wrote: > > On 25-Oct-19 12:37 PM, han.li1@zte.com.cn wrote: > > it seems your patch is later then mine? > > you rejected mine patch and then committed yours? > > I can't understand.... > > > > Hi, > > Apologies for the confusion. My patch's v1 was sent in July this year, > much earlier than yours: > > http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=3D5813&state=3D%2A&arch= ive=3Dboth > > And it's a more general patch, that also fixes the issue for FreeBSD. > This is the patch that got committed - it came in first, and it fixes > the issue in a more general way, for Linux and for FreeBSD. It's just > that for some reason i was under the impression that it was already > accepted, but it was merely deferred till 19.11. > > Again, my apologies for the confusion. I should have looked at your > patch more closely. I took Anatoly patches since his work on the subject preceded your patch. Please, test the current master branch and see if you still have issues. Thanks. --=20 David Marchand