From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F337A059F; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 13:19:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 159BE1D3F0; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 13:19:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.81]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F3F1C298 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 13:19:35 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1586517575; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KZsbwdWlJ6x46F1hIGH99kVXvrUVPj+87vV1hKLsC74=; b=VB7BGSzSuQOuwfYQ7kYG/NchNMz9TNgL6XmLHX0l9/k4VIOsc0sDwhN5UL8Qb7tChxUWpE Jjxh8++1i/mN7usZCOFlyX+oriU58i3Rb2LZcS6YQL3gfUjZTzOHOq3hKUe7nSDNlRw5Qo ETTT+PBDj8MAzYoHJI5iQOg4jIC/ePU= Received: from mail-vk1-f200.google.com (mail-vk1-f200.google.com [209.85.221.200]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-415-BtyTasriNaGoafyp2b1ErQ-1; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 07:19:33 -0400 X-MC-Unique: BtyTasriNaGoafyp2b1ErQ-1 Received: by mail-vk1-f200.google.com with SMTP id v83so815506vke.2 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 04:19:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=h8DLDNtRMt+2q2O+wOg8BsWnsjM5zaUREQrouvziFLo=; b=Hgrmdso7GGf0wLDaDNhtc7olMF4i2xi2gDipwbs6oV7xgqhI/9F42ri9dJOUNIdNO9 aUTg59jNFoyQ0J302ScgUSOwhEsz2G20LqCF86gTomZdfGoV8bNOe+neUQJp9R37wv3/ zgkBbiMT1h/bq2kURMFtsTZ56JUChmZm8NY0KRiUX0Eop9R+G9NUemzFJrS5/vdCANt4 uAsmRe/TfVJ3AvRH9fBuBPWhnjUPmR4vCNsD7X1qpUaOJHsqfmsRLVLgOgugKAANhTAp EKEhTaMcgoZNaactuetrid6QIvEG6f9ILE3TgZLyfwY5g5cbnitp8wjK34uEGHshDgKp j67g== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYgAvupzhd+Hw9RyfO+x4JAIJUXRl3gH1dpN+g2ri5oJmMg/lx+ HvtQI9KXkrv210udmtuoiMGvJ3rwvA/4kCG3SmkRCSEPyW4tet4sZebdZlYKK4ZL7y4+A2V1oMq BPQyK27HxVNP0kIM6LN0= X-Received: by 2002:a67:8dc8:: with SMTP id p191mr3375208vsd.198.1586517573256; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 04:19:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKkHG7Bin20kCbceZsepsU2fS06Gsk2vnILyECAsZfS+lQhr3LFS4X4JXi19NzlHn5jkvUHZsSDpJxF8PIlQKo= X-Received: by 2002:a67:8dc8:: with SMTP id p191mr3375199vsd.198.1586517572954; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 04:19:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <156a0627fb472087aad43d9279ab0f684a2367ce.1585746650.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com> <793d4b3c1828fc5a6f4f0f2bfc5f93b7fd95556f.1585818128.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <793d4b3c1828fc5a6f4f0f2bfc5f93b7fd95556f.1585818128.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com> From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 13:19:21 +0200 Message-ID: To: Anatoly Burakov Cc: dev , David Christensen X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] test/malloc: run realloc tests on external heap X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hello Anatoly, On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 11:07 AM Anatoly Burakov wrote: > > Due to the fact that the rte_realloc() test depends on the layout of > underlying memory, it can sometimes fail due to fragmentation of the > memory. To address this, make it so that the realloc autotests are run > using a newly created external memory heap instead of main memory. > > Bugzilla ID: 424 Is it worth backporting? Thanks. --=20 David Marchand