From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Zhichao Zeng <zhichaox.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, qi.z.zhang@intel.com, daxuex.gao@intel.com,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>,
Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
Wenjun Wu <wenjun1.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/iavf: fix old GCC compilation warnings
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 08:58:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8y9F6ARpXEtZQnjVUjy5KMFSwvf0WJNhNMpQ+zWna2cGw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230609054156.605581-1-zhichaox.zeng@intel.com>
On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 7:35 AM Zhichao Zeng <zhichaox.zeng@intel.com> wrote:
>
> The code uses the Wimplicit-fallthrough compile option to ignore
> falls through warnings in switch case, but this option was introduced
> by GCC 7 and old GCC do not recognize the option.
>
> Add judgment to avoid warnings about unrecognized options in old GCC.
>
> Fixes: 95a1b0b23140 ("net/iavf: support Rx timestamp offload on SSE")
> Fixes: 4f58266da4d3 ("net/iavf: support Rx timestamp offload on AVX2")
> Fixes: d65eadb9e178 ("net/iavf: support Rx timestamp offload on AVX512")
> Signed-off-by: Zhichao Zeng <zhichaox.zeng@intel.com>
This is ugly.
I don't think we introduced a marker for this in EAL, but at least I
see other drivers use /* fallthrough */.
Prefer this form, please.
IOW:
diff --git a/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_sse.c
b/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_sse.c
index b754122c51..81ea154519 100644
--- a/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_sse.c
+++ b/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_sse.c
@@ -1126,24 +1126,26 @@ _recv_raw_pkts_vec_flex_rxd(struct iavf_rx_queue *rxq,
nb_pkts_recd += var;
#ifndef RTE_LIBRTE_IAVF_16BYTE_RX_DESC
-#pragma GCC diagnostic push
-#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wimplicit-fallthrough"
if (rxq->offloads & RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_TIMESTAMP) {
inflection_point = (inflection_point <= var) ?
inflection_point : 0;
switch (inflection_point) {
case 1:
*RTE_MBUF_DYNFIELD(rx_pkts[pos + 0],
iavf_timestamp_dynfield_offset
+ 4, uint32_t *) += 1;
+ /* fallthrough */
case 2:
etc...
--
David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-09 6:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-09 5:41 Zhichao Zeng
2023-06-09 6:58 ` David Marchand [this message]
2023-06-09 7:19 ` Zeng, ZhichaoX
2023-06-09 9:02 ` [PATCH v2] net/iavf: fix " Zhichao Zeng
2023-06-12 8:32 ` Gao, DaxueX
2023-06-12 9:01 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-06-12 12:29 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2023-06-12 14:15 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-06-12 15:08 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2023-06-09 14:38 ` [PATCH] net/iavf: fix old GCC " Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJFAV8y9F6ARpXEtZQnjVUjy5KMFSwvf0WJNhNMpQ+zWna2cGw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=daxuex.gao@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
--cc=konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=wenjun1.wu@intel.com \
--cc=zhichaox.zeng@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).