From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72499A04BA; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 08:51:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C404C1D595; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 08:51:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 641511D410 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 08:51:22 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1601621480; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/RCIH3zWInrtM47iHo6PP3uq7m+A8EXP8WGVKWL7uXc=; b=BCkvblin9YQ2woGmiQA3XaKpZPKiHPDx/vv2YgEQI7R2kO7rEA2NsIizAH+Vs4f3nS0UtH pV5kqRH71nq4g1JfUmmYg+SV2qLuJ87HZ8tN3wAp3Hgvgu4DYO9CbGnNI37VrgYI3kUjS3 zXUaZO0UQsLJ88+0pAG2jjdIZBZi7sw= Received: from mail-ua1-f70.google.com (mail-ua1-f70.google.com [209.85.222.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-280-c6oo9o8kMfiVUf-b8oNzwg-1; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 02:51:17 -0400 X-MC-Unique: c6oo9o8kMfiVUf-b8oNzwg-1 Received: by mail-ua1-f70.google.com with SMTP id w24so185729uan.14 for ; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 23:51:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/RCIH3zWInrtM47iHo6PP3uq7m+A8EXP8WGVKWL7uXc=; b=Vz52x/xZ8hDa7NN+yfWCulx0xSMd41koi/86FbaQPL1aHqv/twn6j6HCKokukwBfr7 65NYxbjvMyttb2e1JwEuRdGpzrzLL4X6XvkfRc7uFZ2V61+HwrGM+luWszRUHK9U5x4H F7JLMjxXBKDEPmY//cRenN+A0UyOngAz0kIawQIf/gjG8X0X1ZEixg5T4eFA9OelTEOd 7puJg/HGqmk8RDQvDHd37FzQ0rDJ/dlGH5VEnW07Aj+q3vj2K0FbTNvZRE0ICUuOJmby 1gzHfFJmarCiggOathykriE1pRTCBFSkHYXwOyPYP55//oFbnAk5ZACnkVzi9ixWyKvo jUvw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530aieSARZ0ICjBODnPgYgb3Bx9uqgc6Cznzgx+wmDM/suTwAI76 QzVmDVSBhsA0Zt3u07RxXVdZOzrQ2ChQo9U3ch5J3tb9J/vuY8DdVBAYDeM3KOEbvKaKxbxlmTD VXPv/yHdZxDB9OREvY+E= X-Received: by 2002:a67:fd7a:: with SMTP id h26mr400489vsa.27.1601621476769; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 23:51:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJydXv0UZSVdzqBYAs1fCXBqTDU0gLDnHV4xvPL21YXjZd2bodJWo1FcqUT9jpz51Q2hUitj4LUtfuPDhkdVfVI= X-Received: by 2002:a67:fd7a:: with SMTP id h26mr400480vsa.27.1601621476510; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 23:51:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 08:51:05 +0200 Message-ID: To: Brandon Lo , Xiao Wang , Maxime Coquelin Cc: ci@dpdk.org, Bruce Richardson , dev , Thomas Monjalon , dpdklab@iol.unh.edu Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-ci] Fedora Rawhide Meson Compile Testing - DPDK Compile Warning X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 8:24 PM Brandon Lo wrote: > We have successfully added Fedora Rawhide to our production pipeline > for Meson compile testing. > The image for the container will be updated on a weekly basis. > > The version of GCC that it is currently running (10.2) catches that > the drivers/vdpa/ifc/base/ifcvf.h file redefines > VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM, originally from > /usr/include/linux/virtio_config.h. > I am just giving you guys a heads-up before the failure report catches > anyone off guard. Brandon, Before putting this new job online, the build issue should have been fixed on the dpdk side. All new submitted series are now getting a fail flag that we must inspect to check whether it is because of this known issue or something else. Please, disable this job. There is also the OpenSuse job failing. Can you investigate? Xiao, Maxime, Anyone free to have a look on the vdpa build issue on Fedora Rawhide? FAILED: drivers/libtmp_rte_pmd_ifc.a.p/vdpa_ifc_ifcvf_vdpa.c.o cc -Idrivers/libtmp_rte_pmd_ifc.a.p -Idrivers -I../drivers -Idrivers/vdpa/ifc -I../drivers/vdpa/ifc -I../drivers/vdpa/ifc/base -Idrivers/bus/pci -I../drivers/bus/pci -I../drivers/bus/pci/linux -I. -I.. -Iconfig -I../config -Ilib/librte_eal/include -I../lib/librte_eal/include -Ilib/librte_eal/linux/include -I../lib/librte_eal/linux/include -Ilib/librte_eal/x86/include -I../lib/librte_eal/x86/include -Ilib/librte_eal/common -I../lib/librte_eal/common -Ilib/librte_eal -I../lib/librte_eal -Ilib/librte_kvargs -I../lib/librte_kvargs -Ilib/librte_metrics -I../lib/librte_metrics -Ilib/librte_telemetry -I../lib/librte_telemetry -Ilib/librte_pci -I../lib/librte_pci -Ilib/librte_vhost -I../lib/librte_vhost -Ilib/librte_ethdev -I../lib/librte_ethdev -Ilib/librte_net -I../lib/librte_net -Ilib/librte_mbuf -I../lib/librte_mbuf -Ilib/librte_mempool -I../lib/librte_mempool -Ilib/librte_ring -I../lib/librte_ring -Ilib/librte_meter -I../lib/librte_meter -Ilib/librte_cryptodev -I../lib/librte_cryptodev -Ilib/librte_hash -I../lib/librte_hash -fdiagnostics-color=always -pipe -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall -Winvalid-pch -Werror -O3 -include rte_config.h -Wextra -Wcast-qual -Wdeprecated -Wformat-nonliteral -Wformat-security -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wold-style-definition -Wpointer-arith -Wsign-compare -Wstrict-prototypes -Wundef -Wwrite-strings -Wno-address-of-packed-member -Wno-packed-not-aligned -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-zero-length-bounds -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC -march=native -DALLOW_EXPERIMENTAL_API -DALLOW_INTERNAL_API -Wno-format-truncation -MD -MQ drivers/libtmp_rte_pmd_ifc.a.p/vdpa_ifc_ifcvf_vdpa.c.o -MF drivers/libtmp_rte_pmd_ifc.a.p/vdpa_ifc_ifcvf_vdpa.c.o.d -o drivers/libtmp_rte_pmd_ifc.a.p/vdpa_ifc_ifcvf_vdpa.c.o -c ../drivers/vdpa/ifc/ifcvf_vdpa.c In file included from ../drivers/vdpa/ifc/ifcvf_vdpa.c:26: ../drivers/vdpa/ifc/base/ifcvf.h:16: error: "VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM" redefined [-Werror] 16 | #define VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM 33 | In file included from /usr/include/linux/virtio_net.h:30, from ../drivers/vdpa/ifc/ifcvf_vdpa.c:11: /usr/include/linux/virtio_config.h:78: note: this is the location of the previous definition 78 | #define VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM | cc1: all warnings being treated as errors Thanks guys. -- David Marchand