From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C24A055E; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:23:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F631BFB1; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:23:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.81]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE6301BF8D for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:23:10 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1582708990; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qNe0M5R0CE4rN021z4cNYCDYshN+vn6pZL+CbInCS90=; b=cuGwUP7yTtigl48Yewd56A7TYPvyloizonUMst0q3W5r3894HRyHXvUVAFiDK+ULOLPPe3 WpeDqKLW/kXKReuhQoTDZspI6witgCPD1W9wGxxfWIN2rCFMKqYZQNcGjZwJwi5DSR4mMZ Uiv11M2RJc7qAtg9iCB+hknN9MA2E+0= Received: from mail-vs1-f71.google.com (mail-vs1-f71.google.com [209.85.217.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-381-Rf2_uezrOgCJVTCULxnhdg-1; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 04:23:08 -0500 X-MC-Unique: Rf2_uezrOgCJVTCULxnhdg-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f71.google.com with SMTP id x15so920622vsq.22 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 01:23:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GufSyHJ6o+tCIAZ3NPrQyTkuMevyl9qcrz7tu3asens=; b=FI6jk4bPknbAFnzkZtQ5QaGllOiRvX3FuyluAGnHePnRF+n8ubgNHsCJ9QNL9SuXxd MFkgzkOmeq3PRFJnLoWRWCgVhkXbQDkvqiKi1EEEAsbBbWufV4QO6i7IlxO78UFXzDnL Ag6p84hCV+M4QoeVBNRPClB/BZg/I+x5Mj5IM+PcUqbe/BRF5/fOPwUMC4wzD7Q5Bani X3Ji++12ht4U03W36dNRqqjN42B7yr/423CABKxDqW2VxSvxscnoCBieA9Lu3eAF62f2 AJWtyuXgOxYHeIje59orM7iy1p3X0ARP/3mkZeikpADo6om54x8MhaLcZfVhV9zahNw5 KT3w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUghEzBMgiQVP3/CTPFVPMSzNMvrz2mZsO2slyXbgiaiFVJKVKm 9jc+V4nRx17SNcnEi3AZt6alzC47khcOA7zYLT8168v4nb8qeJUU/F0SR/V1uztLwey5GWKCIRQ 1FQpkFDrTkG7f4z6fx64= X-Received: by 2002:a67:e342:: with SMTP id s2mr3302373vsm.198.1582708987981; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 01:23:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqztS6Kl5ONADHgCts3DbZfOpfdQoYgtMbRmryVxw+lGkcurkTW9Mk8dvxGIH57sO++ecdRfMJ1dG06TTX+8LAI= X-Received: by 2002:a67:e342:: with SMTP id s2mr3302357vsm.198.1582708987682; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 01:23:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200226091501.27967-1-Sivaprasad.Tummala@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20200226091501.27967-1-Sivaprasad.Tummala@intel.com> From: David Marchand Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:22:56 +0100 Message-ID: To: Sivaprasad Tummala Cc: Marko Kovacevic , Ori Kam , Bruce Richardson , Radu Nicolau , Akhil Goyal , Tomasz Kantecki , Sunil Kumar Kori , Pavan Nikhilesh , dev , Maxime Coquelin , Xiaolong Ye X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] examples/l2fwd: add check for promiscuous no support X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 10:15 AM Sivaprasad Tummala wrote: > > l2fwd application exits, if return for rte_eth_promiscuous_enable > is not success. But for vHost PMD, promiscuous enable returns "Not > Supported". Could the vhost pmd announce that it is already in promiscuous mode? Like in f165210321c4 ("drivers/net: enable promiscuous and multicast by default") --=20 David Marchand