From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dkozlyuk@nvidia.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>,
Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/3] eal: add memory pre-allocation from existing files
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 18:45:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8yHt9oD-xcfwsvidvvotN7zUax6g_A7QZMGJGWqfUc0gg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CH0PR12MB50917161A0063584F79A4BCDB9919@CH0PR12MB5091.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 3:27 PM Dmitry Kozlyuk <dkozlyuk@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> [...]
> > > > - finegrained control of hugepage files, but it has the drawback of
> > > > imposing primary/secondary run with the same options.
> > > > The second part seems complex to configure. I see conflicts with
> > > > existing options, so it seems a good way to get caught up in the
> > > > carpet (sorry if it translates badly from French :p).
> > >
> > > I don't see why synchronizing memory options is a big issue.
> >
> > We have too many options for the memory subsystem.
> >
> > I mentionned --socket-mem, --huge-dir, --file-prefix.
> > But there is also --huge-unlink, --no-shconf, --in-memory, --legacy-mem, -
> > -single-file-segments, --match-allocations and --socket-limit.
> > Some of those do part of the job, others are incompatible with this new
> > option and probably some are orthogonal.
> >
> > Sure we can add a new one that prepare your toasts, coffee and wake up the
> > kids (that's progress!).
> >
> > Maybe you can provide an example on how this is used?
>
> Sorry for the late reply.
No problem.
>
> After more consideration offline with Thomas
> we concluded that the --mem-file option is indeed too intrusive.
> I'm going to propose a new solution for the slow restart issue for 22.02,
> probably with a knob like you proposed,
> only not just changing when the memory is zeroed,
> but most importantly allowing EAL to reuse hugepages.
> So that in the end the usage would be as follows,
> and if it's a restart, memory clearing would be bypassed:
>
> ./dpdk-app --huge-reuse -- ...
>
> Refactoring and benchmark patches may still be useful,
> so review efforts were hopefully not in vain.
> Thank you for asking the right questions!
>
> FWIW, I agree that memory options should be cleaned up independently.
Looking forward to 22.02 :-).
Thanks Dmitry.
--
David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-08 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-05 12:49 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 21.11 0/3] " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-07-05 12:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 21.11 1/3] eal/linux: make hugetlbfs analysis reusable Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-07-05 12:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 21.11 2/3] eal: add memory pre-allocation from existing files Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-07-05 12:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 21.11 3/3] app/test: add allocator performance autotest Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-07-16 11:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 21.11 v2 0/3] eal: add memory pre-allocation from existing files Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-07-16 11:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 21.11 v2 1/3] eal/linux: make hugetlbfs analysis reusable Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-07-16 11:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 21.11 v2 2/3] eal: add memory pre-allocation from existing files Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-07-16 11:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 21.11 v2 3/3] app/test: add allocator performance autotest Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-08-09 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 21.11 v2 0/3] eal: add memory pre-allocation from existing files Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-08-30 8:21 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-09-14 10:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-09-14 10:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] eal/linux: make hugetlbfs analysis reusable Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-09-14 12:48 ` John Levon
2021-09-14 12:57 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-09-16 12:08 ` John Levon
2021-09-14 10:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] eal: add memory pre-allocation from existing files Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-09-14 10:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] app/test: add allocator performance autotest Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-09-20 12:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] eal: add memory pre-allocation from existing files dkozlyuk
2021-09-20 12:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] eal/linux: make hugetlbfs analysis reusable dkozlyuk
2021-09-20 12:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] eal: add memory pre-allocation from existing files dkozlyuk
2021-09-20 12:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] app/test: add allocator performance autotest dkozlyuk
2021-09-21 8:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] eal: add memory pre-allocation from existing files dkozlyuk
2021-09-21 8:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] eal/linux: make hugetlbfs analysis reusable dkozlyuk
2021-09-22 13:52 ` John Levon
2021-10-05 17:36 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-08 15:33 ` John Levon
2021-10-08 15:50 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-09-21 8:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] eal: add memory pre-allocation from existing files dkozlyuk
2021-09-21 8:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] app/test: add allocator performance autotest dkozlyuk
2021-10-11 8:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/3] eal: add memory pre-allocation from existing files Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-11 8:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/3] eal/linux: make hugetlbfs analysis reusable Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-13 8:16 ` David Marchand
2021-10-13 9:21 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-11 8:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/3] eal: add memory pre-allocation from existing files Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-12 15:37 ` David Marchand
2021-10-12 15:55 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-12 17:32 ` David Marchand
2021-10-12 21:09 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-13 10:18 ` David Marchand
2021-11-08 14:27 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-11-08 17:45 ` David Marchand [this message]
2021-10-11 8:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/3] app/test: add allocator performance autotest Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-12 13:53 ` Aaron Conole
2021-10-12 14:48 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15 13:47 ` Aaron Conole
2021-10-11 18:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/3] eal: add memory pre-allocation from existing files Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-11 21:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-ci] " Lincoln Lavoie
2021-10-12 6:54 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJFAV8yHt9oD-xcfwsvidvvotN7zUax6g_A7QZMGJGWqfUc0gg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dkozlyuk@nvidia.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).