From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CDBEA0597; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 17:22:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B0B1BF6C; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 17:22:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1242B86 for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 17:22:32 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1586359352; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=MzFicirPjizUYz/+r2D+hiNmYNeoFBV7Br7BGkFw95s=; b=VYIlyjSBba5Ci29Awt/mnPjbLls4U5QUvFETp6OexTWrAirHhqSvIsu1HXeAmAIBik8/St uKGbp/THz7NXVUI8Fz98mH4cMSujZ2s4BwI/ujiCLMLbjLkWTc0OVYun1Pkt/EEnEH/8m5 6dx1YxU+4y4oRdgqk2MwtROWu39TNEk= Received: from mail-ua1-f72.google.com (mail-ua1-f72.google.com [209.85.222.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-109-x-sv4gScNmKl3xx6bltoBQ-1; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 11:22:24 -0400 X-MC-Unique: x-sv4gScNmKl3xx6bltoBQ-1 Received: by mail-ua1-f72.google.com with SMTP id f45so1636477uae.10 for ; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 08:22:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+9feZaURrd2KSO6cnjzf+3XMZMKSSdPEdg+t7CKRdZc=; b=Fmo1MwPF4H6BjaDAwpLgPaJJuyf6JFvqcPrUvlOIaiR3Sn+uJI6leTwuumV9u1FM38 vOIsNIvxB/CvEL67nMQg0pBHoVTQhOHt3STJqjgxeu4l2dDVlexfVtVRhV6XXB0Xvksp iat2rTuhgqJyFEkWxt2JCxyDz4N+Wbg3+y5N3XzC42J2ZtVLGq5OBPJheU1Q1EqyWqWh J9Tu8xYrhR9ZVOtpaj5afgDcw/GjB3kztzTXQmEHaIPDFz/wRzDJ1dUMoGLKlm44daYl bIkqLuqf8Ho0iypsxmCR8s+0D8j8KoVNEgU6Yp+cSSsNmvZXI8hPbgLwvMQdGVuixnq2 z+ow== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZW8xlRCGAF4bZQVy7fEUHi3Qo6wTjPuCb1LFqhQov3LcA4XPRT av5lf5rj+1uh/tK0KLxIBO3dlj8Xc7AgxQjvMmNE1GSORv2ITu69H+i3/eg1+66oz6swuPunjn8 GIQfpUGC9ljdtH9Ws1Xg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:3d4:: with SMTP id n20mr170245vsq.39.1586359344121; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 08:22:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLRoR0VTssagCyCBt2TSSoA14jV8u2MxZd4aYbksQVMZKf6BeaAFS5ll9O+ULOiJaoh1wZGhNBygsiNX3vOmoc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:3d4:: with SMTP id n20mr170093vsq.39.1586359342858; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 08:22:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200303162728.93744-1-gavin.hu@arm.com> <20200307155629.45021-1-gavin.hu@arm.com> <4135ab73-75d3-421a-264d-2951fc096133@intel.com> <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35C60EA3@smartserver.smartshare.dk> <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35C60EAC@smartserver.smartshare.dk> <20200311120739.GA1922@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> <30507744-63d4-c24b-4cc3-de7adff871f6@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 17:22:11 +0200 Message-ID: To: Gavin Hu Cc: Kevin Traynor , Bruce Richardson , =?UTF-8?Q?Morten_Br=C3=B8rup?= , Ferruh Yigit , "dev@dpdk.org" , nd , "thomas@monjalon.net" , "jerinj@marvell.com" , Honnappa Nagarahalli , Ruifeng Wang , Phil Yang , Joyce Kong , "stable@dpdk.org" , Olivier MATZ , Konstantin Ananyev , Andrew Rybchenko X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] mbuf: replace zero-length marker with unnamed union X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 5:05 PM Gavin Hu wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kevin Traynor > > Hi Gavin, I lost track if v2 is still a candidate for merge. fwiw, it > > compiles without giving the zero-length-bounds warning on my system. > > > > Kevin. > > Yes, this path alone is a candidate for merge. This patch is not mergeable, it would trigger failures in the ABI checks. You can see in patchwork that the robot reported a warning in Travis. http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2020-March/119919.html https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/jobs/295652710#L4476 I opened a bz to libabigail. https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D25661 Either a different solution is found, or your patch will have to deal with this issue (libabigail fix won't be ready soon afaik) and waive this. --=20 David Marchand