From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F30D9A04DB; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 11:11:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C32D1DCF7; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 11:11:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA841C134 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 11:10:59 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1602839458; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=k1lwDxQa3n5laFwDu2V4jsi3Jo6V2d9iR21Mhhw8mR4=; b=RJ/gj8B0gPHIwVFgjOEnSvV7flQRtIMgPVe5s8+bOSkI71/Am5y65Rf2jSQWBqx+tsAKuD 0C7O+kS57u8KhwYTqVGAO/E2ztmDNinNw3nm7US+ounJrNh/xyF8ffViQBcwph8Zczveq2 +uy+AMiGE6TldYxh78JVuslSGa5EcSM= Received: from mail-vs1-f69.google.com (mail-vs1-f69.google.com [209.85.217.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-221-BVuVUKVjMTa-hMzdVixtPw-1; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 05:10:56 -0400 X-MC-Unique: BVuVUKVjMTa-hMzdVixtPw-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f69.google.com with SMTP id v203so195726vsv.8 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 02:10:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=k1lwDxQa3n5laFwDu2V4jsi3Jo6V2d9iR21Mhhw8mR4=; b=gWDg5R8T0udWIFSIQv737T/im1+GlD5rg0QnT13NeDT65VC1FVQkdvvlD6cYJLKGrc VLOFDIqMTYUrcH4ceXwTjG+eyVWuxlcar3db4MeKfqBfx9zlHGWO0BABqBB5hUEOkkIl J3i4e7TQjTTbh/x6HFaXNquRVIJGPz3tS8q7ke0VKVk+3J/ib8J9Il41vsOdPHSQFFAG 0uKyJY2S4V3GEtfrHl0IahPy97ZGvqRPJHtZp77H4yGA8DFv956NWwJiUFy1ZALxZQY4 hDw3zbOzH1AB/9e/mRovzAzJM0Yr26Rcm6dGj392UZBFy1v4tBDPs4qrkDQZeOhMptu/ G91w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533SFlSamnsXwuTjNYFkfI1poUgihEeqYisROhakdhs464qU8H52 IeFhePjyB23iahjaAJ923K+pqZw55JAtfSNjvetLs2qG6VRSQ6APRy0/ng0ytCWEEdm1afWGnv2 mG3qzpVddnOEBguHSOjM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:5d:: with SMTP id k29mr1132289vsp.17.1602839455851; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 02:10:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwlKemull+Kdg1yImGKh3dcrZGYmGuDu/ZSLuSMk5mcwkI0efSjrEQGlPMTegs/Yo0qz3qlzCzwaUVkrLdhk3s= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:5d:: with SMTP id k29mr1132281vsp.17.1602839455648; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 02:10:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200807155859.63888-1-ciara.power@intel.com> <20201016081320.186775-1-ciara.power@intel.com> <20201016081320.186775-6-ciara.power@intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 11:10:44 +0200 Message-ID: To: Somnath Kotur Cc: Ciara Power , dev , Jan Viktorin , "Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)" , Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran , David Christensen , Bruce Richardson , "Ananyev, Konstantin" , Ajit Khaparde Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 05/18] net/bnxt: add checks for max SIMD bitwidth X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 11:06 AM Somnath Kotur wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 1:43 PM Ciara Power wrote: > > > > When choosing a vector path to take, an extra condition must be > > satisfied to ensure the max SIMD bitwidth allows for the CPU enabled > > path. > > > > Cc: Ajit Khaparde > > Cc: Somnath Kotur > > > > Signed-off-by: Ciara Power > Acked-by Somnath kotur For patchwork to catch it, fixing: Acked-by: Somnath Kotur -- David Marchand