From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E672460FB; Thu, 23 Jan 2025 13:23:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC5A40269; Thu, 23 Jan 2025 13:23:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E6040263 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2025 13:23:32 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1737635011; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=x8FxEEb7exFvVkTT/+uXsCQODNPpyYTC85NvjHajc7w=; b=NqFw00NAF/CClbdFpUd/6hi7U0ggasgROrgwrbX5cat2yt7iVrH2IB0iBjrBGHIcocDrer ERvIeC81W5zuIXwKH/Xlf02R9rf8oCZHLWyhqOU9eROc/uLzwA8Zs2cc3mii1vgi/ZEWTd +u7YpxcbZ6bf+mU6ZfBvJrFJaZSFKgc= Received: from mail-lf1-f71.google.com (mail-lf1-f71.google.com [209.85.167.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-218-PuTR1rYpMPGjOJusp2rLCA-1; Thu, 23 Jan 2025 07:23:30 -0500 X-MC-Unique: PuTR1rYpMPGjOJusp2rLCA-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: PuTR1rYpMPGjOJusp2rLCA Received: by mail-lf1-f71.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-53eec8cebe8so428095e87.0 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2025 04:23:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1737635009; x=1738239809; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=x8FxEEb7exFvVkTT/+uXsCQODNPpyYTC85NvjHajc7w=; b=iTwGi6X44fA2Jt6FdCohx6Qnak7TpEBadwYNEiNGSigCoMeYMkrHwpmzaI8T6K4KK8 YDvvaDMCqxIanoBFunt5xafZ1Q6bI0hRieJMTaWq0xhb/Guis88bmhi6towVWRXrJ9lf jPQHmdAZSTxTaebVoYf3OrcQejGF3Fln23byk+36EXM5xyji8kSHMBcbI1a07rR+HZm8 /RhdmNu7sli+Nt91EkF6E8SHu+gADvINvXd7VLk0fQPQ8R/QgaQnVQQFVebOfpBL4/v/ YPD9Plrc+1olKjP/RKAdg17X9l8/61PHibKMTWsmLpAimuB0npHHi0+08QqE/1rdSvXS Vfxg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXrsDNC7K1dUTFncIj4nuixaLKQfC+dI5MRgTLzeg0wxcfxGpWl4A9uYjyqAyp02BEaJhI=@dpdk.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxciOQgvjXacQ4yAfgEUWpwNT9E6Jr2giwReEGDKexmLrx+YOKc nnng1TYZqbvvohiV2i0P/QgZO3ZQyH+da7S2J24qiB6sYhSo4lz4HMzndWBfZhDYTFi9G8CnYqP OnztjZ1MBQ5a2UclOMBfgvmmReQ78MmCTlxWDJZHwonpZHawsT/Uga5qbTMxAU32FJwRHAeD4QO eNsNCmZJajGaAN9YI= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvZdnPhmv48LtwkFY3nWlZ2TVeaMUv08pjsUA9AhUBGDSMEYKfgos+3k+qCa9a okw4to/F12YGrHhEKtsktkFs0hcJGQ2NlaJFIjhDLTNGfqXuYbCTFfw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3f13:b0:542:99a7:b415 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-543c218c7d5mr1436078e87.0.1737635008935; Thu, 23 Jan 2025 04:23:28 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEkb4baiJ2gU68A+IK1MnhFMDm1uuZlzutEMjo18LNSkeV0sn89xMNkw66w3XeevxFAn3y4LwBtT1WNvreFwX0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3f13:b0:542:99a7:b415 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-543c218c7d5mr1436060e87.0.1737635008547; Thu, 23 Jan 2025 04:23:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1735254890-18457-3-git-send-email-andremue@linux.microsoft.com> <1737559244-9107-1-git-send-email-andremue@linux.microsoft.com> In-Reply-To: <1737559244-9107-1-git-send-email-andremue@linux.microsoft.com> From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 13:23:15 +0100 X-Gm-Features: AbW1kvbVRwn6jEffSkOhts5rR342TRFCXcEVw2N0tMzFA2IjRecNSOwylKDDwZ4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] fix void function returning a value To: bruce.richardson@intel.com Cc: anatoly.burakov@intel.com, Andre Muezerie , dev@dpdk.org, ian.stokes@intel.com, konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru, vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: hu1AYLYorTIt7cfHtZz8M2yl6kYUXYxOkeBQzau-sq8_1737635009 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Hello Bruce, On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 4:21=E2=80=AFPM Andre Muezerie wrote: > > v2: > * Updated commit messages to follow standard format. > > This patch avoids warnings like the one below emitted by MSVC, and is > needed to get the code to compile cleanly with MSVC. > > ../drivers/common/idpf/idpf_common_rxtx_avx512.c(139): > warning C4098: 'idpf_singleq_rearm': > 'void' function returning a value > > Andre Muezerie (2): > drivers/common: fix void function returning a value > drivers/net: fix void function returning a value > > drivers/common/idpf/idpf_common_rxtx_avx512.c | 12 ++++++++---- > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_avx2.c | 2 +- > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_avx512.c | 2 +- > drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_avx2.c | 2 +- > drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_avx2.c | 2 +- > 5 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) I see the series is delegated to the main repo (Thomas). This touches only Intel drivers and the code deduplication effort you started may conflict (though trivially) with such changes depending on when it lands. Would you mind merging this fixes from Andre through the next-net-intel tree, right now? If so, please mark it as delegated to you in patchwork. Thanks! --=20 David Marchand