From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5AF47187; Mon, 5 Jan 2026 13:50:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCDCB40613; Mon, 5 Jan 2026 13:50:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 128884026F for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2026 13:50:49 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1767617449; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=H8RxXLjMSBH//sk3JQZ7qh7IiJ0AJWCmmIZaq86ygfM=; b=V40iN9d77nnZNxWWZRkAzBt0V9Pi2ZAN6SXViMAi1knySeke1jv3J3LTzExnQdpNKqL6kE hI0AVSEYjNsUOIFXr/dxYkWookOsp7i/FjSB/+5+Lg+i2Wy+hgaKAzk+ojOzLM18gdD6wG H/CZtJqeEUzlZPNddS0ovPJ0Dd9s4do= Received: from mail-lj1-f199.google.com (mail-lj1-f199.google.com [209.85.208.199]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-589-ssHLYFljMFigiBXbJ5N3eg-1; Mon, 05 Jan 2026 07:50:48 -0500 X-MC-Unique: ssHLYFljMFigiBXbJ5N3eg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: ssHLYFljMFigiBXbJ5N3eg_1767617447 Received: by mail-lj1-f199.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-37fd49d4907so67524641fa.1 for ; Mon, 05 Jan 2026 04:50:48 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1767617446; x=1768222246; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=H8RxXLjMSBH//sk3JQZ7qh7IiJ0AJWCmmIZaq86ygfM=; b=DFvuy3H3PZVW8iFpqxdrDpR59JFFGQYBopbUv4aFel+n/qonviZAnggwVdbk81tlAC bXVuRlcxBy9U9lcI5+JVqug4kDpjEZoC7rAVjdUBgxXv3094xi9khbEiLjkT/0C0HHwd T60yd4pv9E0pz2FH0iv3bhcDZE3z3R2ZknoPYXISS69QlBwoo8st2Umq219CJ6ZAxPSI uTgJILqngskju6cPQJ5USMz0GYOtRySZlTlWCxrCA2ggXOYCxdkswoaLnaK9Vz3mPWS8 VBoylZJ7fkghNiokm52anCpu8PgVbrTLhwZSmPX0FQJroD7M6jZdtW/Up9hdg20QPGPr O7jw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzidV8OB8PWDWNj9SKfuxDNBGwDhuPJjhvdfQ3ZsV9HgtQukGgl dLHnMJph/P/sthqOBM+W93Ba9zbUkEDhzLxRSJMwk1z0hFhWPK0QUPb/WShXJs/5U5cpkmWiwS0 ZjJt6+AemlaTMg+Q5YN5bSDLbgoHA1TAiwXoCZxmJnF2L/3LFlQLCi3xMD2oULFhqqlpFtBzMk0 M4Dfn91ZIqqqi2TjoZgo3pRtWTi18= X-Gm-Gg: AY/fxX6SJtzzjzrHCZrQWL0HKux9OPGlPueYUCT9IXdbKTjEDNLDYd57l+cmTl5ypfv AMAl8lrBc20TGOkU3vJTqiKYZFUS56WdHNNcqYCsOB5SwlmnR2AvnOF2pYfOFk5e61RA5E5/jxx cKobk7+oUX0AnBys36oLkFqHZ5Oh2CsQcYpz+fUuiB6+c8surBH0KhD59oEtpc84t7VZRI X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:1443:b0:382:4d6b:993b with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-3824d6b9c18mr115244181fa.35.1767617446349; Mon, 05 Jan 2026 04:50:46 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHvy2VTgeh8+ZJ1q1VzYyVB2monJczoN/Q625Qj9agaBnacuVg4h2tM88gH3ZoVV5rkcU2gXwk/3qBhwZlH46E= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:1443:b0:382:4d6b:993b with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-3824d6b9c18mr115244081fa.35.1767617445886; Mon, 05 Jan 2026 04:50:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20260105123640.48325-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20260105123640.48325-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> From: David Marchand Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2026 13:50:31 +0100 X-Gm-Features: AQt7F2q9tbXPtj4RcUIDmqoMLooE8doWCt_LCCfUavyYbfyfUJ0ONsd-6XHq1Us Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/tap: remove log when running without multiprocess To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: stable@dpdk.org, Stephen Hemminger , Ferruh Yigit , Kumara Parameshwaran X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: mKF76x00DXjHGV9OOelz_kmFRATOjKnSHSlw1sDtySU_1767617447 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Mon, 5 Jan 2026 at 13:37, David Marchand wrote: > > In case DPDK is started with multiprocess disabled (like in OVS), there > is no reason to log an error on multiprocess aspects. > > Note: the only caller of this helper does not check the return value. > > Fixes: c36ce7099c21 ("net/tap: fix to populate FDs in secondary process") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: David Marchand I chose to simply silence this warning, though I think something is wrong with the sync mechanism. Secondary processes should be the one requesting fds, instead of the primary process broadcasting to all. -- David Marchand