From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B51E2A04B1; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 10:16:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A36A1DB74; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 10:16:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061201DB71 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 10:16:25 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1600848985; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=RWcuopILZv2y+0FRDzDbPNUaLlJGcQPa7Bx+zfzktn4=; b=KRqDHjUKRe1xnAji+tiG7EzFKaa8McHOfbPX26HEp2BlIZ1eZeZAvJp31elWgbDYWxf4vX s7j3OQBLgr9w7WbvVNEyYpxzChfWaXfnwLkjnLMuLN2DJheE2gHCGXcb1KxPfGwJnIjANd NpHsGU6P2khHBj28lG3emwMeSh280AU= Received: from mail-vs1-f72.google.com (mail-vs1-f72.google.com [209.85.217.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-9-JR901HuNNiGRGulQ6Y0WXQ-1; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 04:16:17 -0400 X-MC-Unique: JR901HuNNiGRGulQ6Y0WXQ-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f72.google.com with SMTP id h8so5728528vsh.19 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 01:16:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RWcuopILZv2y+0FRDzDbPNUaLlJGcQPa7Bx+zfzktn4=; b=qNm9HeJVfqSzR0eCT36CkilIMz05JzWvX3di3tdQ7ha4FNHMHPqqm/U2ViJVTYuSyM x2g41xbe6y3qveXvagg5OsNEF+3aXN+EFbuAWiLY6co9HlYSPJODkVtVaXWJZGWB+Ovx xmRj1c5uIGStVJUwyWOsMO6e4K1N0+HqYj7OsyVT0Uw+4UXUpSCd+jNMj78BPyf0+v9s kUmvIq6QJxi5PDs/sGjtTiOAMbNCxk/O2tKRzrxB7RIZbyLnYuRlIo2G7JhmJECYfbnP nU7UAPPo4Wk7iB3cQE7BvWy3RgdMQZRMM2KcRBi/J5gUMnj359B07jD6f5PUjXE7J4Cb 2LCA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533HJy819q7Bo8UHAuP/98ULN8H2tzFR+1UwTDadYF/wZ7Glz1+b uFgZb6vLdM5XAG53CdG48wwswUQjfinntP1l6bVs/BxLjQ6Xg5Lh8GTNcvn9vebozDuj6aXgcxV UkR8ZQ83W5NE+246WvIU= X-Received: by 2002:a67:e2c2:: with SMTP id i2mr6199525vsm.27.1600848977280; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 01:16:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyBrOhUO/v4cQ6637+93haXi0ai2fSSJ21iBPsU2/bS3R3pODeUe0f4slyEkQJ5bzyRZ+MI32Dy3M+NECHAvFQ= X-Received: by 2002:a67:e2c2:: with SMTP id i2mr6199519vsm.27.1600848977082; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 01:16:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200727220341.29084-1-manishc@marvell.com> <20200727220341.29084-2-manishc@marvell.com> <20200727223540.g253dv5qmyp7ljmb@u256.net> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 10:16:05 +0200 Message-ID: To: Jerin Jacob , =?UTF-8?Q?Ga=C3=ABtan_Rivet?= , Manish Chopra Cc: Ferruh Yigit , dpdk-dev , Igor Russkikh , Rasesh Mody , GR-Everest-DPDK-Dev , Rosen Xu , Tianfei zhang , Heinrich Kuhn , Qiming Yang , Qi Zhang , Thomas Monjalon Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/6] drivers: add generic API to find PCI extended cap X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 9:33 PM Jerin Jacob wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 4:06 AM Ga=C3=ABtan Rivet wrote: > > > > On 27/07/20 15:03 -0700, Manish Chopra wrote: > > > By adding generic API, this patch removes individual > > > functions/defines implemented by drivers to find extended > > > PCI capabilities. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Manish Chopra > > > Signed-off-by: Igor Russkikh > > > > LGTM, > > Reviewed-by: Gaetan Rivet > > Gaetan Acked this change. > This patch has dependency on other qede patches in the series. I can see a v4 and v5 series. https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=3D11335 https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=3D11421 The v5 has no review tag and the pci patch had a comment from Nithin. https://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/75042/#117363 > > Hi Thomas, David, Ferruh, > > Should I take this patch through next-net-mrvl. if not, Could you > merge this patch to next-net or main branch so that i can take the > remaining patches in this series. Let's first sort this out. Thanks. --=20 David Marchand