From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E664A0C4B; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 17:28:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3995F4112E; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 17:28:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4AAB40E50 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 17:28:18 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1634225298; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dKbFDfg5g6Fe8jCoqkW+Ya5Y/lp8Tp2im/5Zjuo2zm4=; b=Lb2hIpYPfo9K7Hf5bnHfVUzUPTfuFpGLdTkTNIQnE5ABZ92LrnuVIfaoYGcWLuPgyJqZij +Avc7x5S++BWBSlsA0APZQlj0jK0Crd3ZHnvi9OzIpaiahird6j6JoouNYZN25kABKiyuH O5RwH7bTTlaZ5iQirWpJsVRN1VDp6z8= Received: from mail-lf1-f72.google.com (mail-lf1-f72.google.com [209.85.167.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-239-sbsWlh4fMrm_EsQHLcZ11A-1; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 11:28:15 -0400 X-MC-Unique: sbsWlh4fMrm_EsQHLcZ11A-1 Received: by mail-lf1-f72.google.com with SMTP id i19-20020a0565123e1300b003fdc4e26333so295481lfv.12 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 08:28:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dKbFDfg5g6Fe8jCoqkW+Ya5Y/lp8Tp2im/5Zjuo2zm4=; b=y9HVrMC61XM2pn+jrdXKMX8GP0ObkGhaPqI7rEobfrbCoVUuKcjsSKS+AxUrILamCI nSNoidiCpOrWPygxstJ5CLKvyJcMguMb7BoDKSXuo00+hQ5D/zelGDOFb2enFMRpIasJ 98koiCbFfVbsDvwCYYSbbO5DQyWTS1FLTYeDoU0w6HUBBj8bRBSD73cV7LK7LxfGYXPb 2iC4ukjqlEDvjwp0Y/s+XolTS+Bd664niaJynzhsGEcifzQizEgbTZPzvSkk5g/tRJGt 7eoWtDUTzi/FzkydjRCDcQnybsv3zTH1wTYhW0DlfqAVxPzop4dKyVvUecTTlJ1oL+1e eKjw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531yhkhmZUcB7xjMZuJRfLqGY5FXumybX7dPjhvEJhO6KyFi4Rk1 T4VqgqSGWAmA4HkY+7FxZy6Vxs7rbzC/4tylL+8+wBkidp+LFbjSG9ugFGu27xW6eOnERerZE2a 05VmZeahCOG4yNC7ewhM= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:2f02:: with SMTP id v2mr6467323ljv.46.1634225293969; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 08:28:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxIGjL9pLY82Qz1PQvtfWpwDw1q4DyhCnOZXatYmNIAJvNil6ciDk5yoCutvKz/o5BoLRjY1Gfkthpfs5XDbrc= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:2f02:: with SMTP id v2mr6467305ljv.46.1634225293769; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 08:28:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210909194243.19189-1-drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20210909194243.19189-1-drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 17:28:02 +0200 Message-ID: To: David Christensen Cc: dev , Honnappa Nagarahalli , "Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)" Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/ppc: replace rte_atomicXX ops with C11 atomic builtins X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 9:43 PM David Christensen wrote: > > Replace existing PPC assembly code for rte_atomicXX ops with compiler > atomic builtins as prevously adopted by DPDK (see [1] and [2]). This previously* > has the additional benefit of resolving a POWER10 build failure due to an > outstanding gcc issue which fails on the existing PPC assembly code [3]. > > [1] https://www.dpdk.org/blog/2021/03/26/dpdk-adopts-the-c11-memory-model/ > [2] https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.html > [3] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98519 > > Signed-off-by: David Christensen Applied, thanks. -- David Marchand