From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE9FA058A; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 17:36:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B8ED1E90C; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 17:36:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C371DE5E for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 17:36:05 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1587137764; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EVN3//+WMpmkchhd8dHCQjIi9/UHEC69jrykK3CXNhw=; b=KoIsLA1UAF21lKREmrKp3ieIRKK7UxRB3YSZzkMMBOlEOqRN2y7qQnAP4pczZ7Tnv/baT9 Ro1vhWlhNXojGIhhEendoRNQ9l+dcFaEzVPeb8c8HcZyRZFqqj/QA6WHgzfhQPs439e9H6 1zWo80gaPEnyeJKJj+LhIATW4ndp+bY= Received: from mail-ua1-f72.google.com (mail-ua1-f72.google.com [209.85.222.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-491-GMEzFjDZPwiwB4bZawf9LQ-1; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:36:01 -0400 X-MC-Unique: GMEzFjDZPwiwB4bZawf9LQ-1 Received: by mail-ua1-f72.google.com with SMTP id v17so1032429uao.7 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 08:36:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EVN3//+WMpmkchhd8dHCQjIi9/UHEC69jrykK3CXNhw=; b=uoCc2/2/E/OXpbTSuiAlujsLnzNfLtNG+0mQgCLaWf/LtIxmtjGFsNo9vawbHfsn9M dXZMmLlfGPqZQa/8lHnYP7btTIjigfo2j0gQUGZmWepBhhUzjn9WCnXVXIV4tAAVehqq Vuwz/+MkI7lkZaS2r4epuOASyjjuSEDohgYLqJgFY07bL0MLqKo0PUqFpGkVmhAzxAnb fjjwfx6xdfKYDtOPu833I/gkYSTdXGy43c3GaV0ZhMyCZFWP3niXR9oSzWGklIuieg6+ 5/UnjyqXQ2933siT+bAiG9g1cv+8rYhfW1BAAXLJ/xOA5dqB8debZhVV+T3sZ1yzDCoK 9epQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZwCkDm1x0UNRtEO1J73Wn76A4hC7HK7lqEeJV4SyVs9f/v7CSQ L1f6sk8x5ZO7qN5otJXiUUN19XnQSaTLOAKVLqA8J9M/0Ir9urbQ/JC6bkkL08LNOOvvCWTqQ8g BbwF4TO5+eoTDzgBF5Gw= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:cb82:: with SMTP id b124mr3124518vkg.39.1587137760663; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 08:36:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypK0UlmQmIHbND55J6Aj5OsbifdJHrH+u4ENyU7DKEuQWKeEOcEx98MIeTsEVUOhZImOuNE6v+3Bt/zcDHsdlaQ= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:cb82:: with SMTP id b124mr3124506vkg.39.1587137760417; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 08:36:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191216075501.15669-1-skori@marvell.com> <20200407092856.554-1-skori@marvell.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 17:35:48 +0200 Message-ID: To: Sunil Kumar Kori Cc: Stephen Hemminger , Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran , dev X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] bus/pci: optimise scanning with whitelist/blacklist X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 5:12 PM Sunil Kumar Kori wrote: > >Your current patch is a no go anyway. > >The __rte_experimental tagging makes no sense. > > That=E2=80=99s not a problem. My only intention is to resolve a problem = what we have observed and > corresponding fix caters a practical use case. > If you don=E2=80=99t like the way it is implemented then we can go with y= our suggested way. > Please let me know, will you be sending that github patch or should I sen= d ? And again. The experimental tag is *useless*. private.h is not exported to users, the symbol you want to add is internal to the pci bus library. I will stop at this. --=20 David Marchand