From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3F245B68; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 08:49:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64AD340265; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 08:49:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E6984025F for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 08:49:08 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1729234147; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2zMJkiyJqnUcVQ196cUENgbkMxxdVhzufu8s/ZfImXk=; b=ORJGDJU3LgPNM4KRON5mMBTLlfuoGh/47Sy9VLngY57NRjmzimSv4blQ1QvfOVqLWkQXfU VgQ/L/W6P/+wKYgMExefuus8JE8W7lWllDRMUcTi87eZzQyIt9+3cAXxEoCZT3ofpqFQA9 a2n8j0RHcRGQajJwSsdLN7gVM0U+rMQ= Received: from mail-lf1-f69.google.com (mail-lf1-f69.google.com [209.85.167.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-411-kehBJVFiO7mH8KbtH62_qA-1; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 02:49:04 -0400 X-MC-Unique: kehBJVFiO7mH8KbtH62_qA-1 Received: by mail-lf1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-539f5f33333so1552712e87.1 for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 23:49:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1729234143; x=1729838943; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=2zMJkiyJqnUcVQ196cUENgbkMxxdVhzufu8s/ZfImXk=; b=DKhPQk12X2nJ/faP1mqaXZGMCNabZRVgvjeARVeKKmpq7bVPpuMLXkm4SOzycpc3gN YD/fhHXkQZhOuRBH/bS6Kocvsa65BZvoZrV+XuWFdFaDS9TKIJT4F0H/OJ0jsAfSlPrH EUGPtMOxlLFpQCdYSajMJKTsOjdaZAvJJXIPAZPaX4zSOa9aVOqyYUT/fdi5HbpQRw6m OOffL4uiZxR//4CLRU2BeK8oSkE6ZjNEXQwyMPhq1jKRWNRKEH37w9PZCQxgPaRdsou9 eEFgT66SekveBmk7YJGl7CkjnSWwKMK5bANQgZLGFEs3yNe2jfm02wwQyB3ol/2GN3FQ 57AA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxX2l4mCmvCSPOX6kWFvWvrvW8Qz0dbYz3kP5CVN4KKWsFmZf+q Wx5ZsMGLlKyKFzTDkCymWWuIEtAPrY6fcHlpDB7414TwYco4hUxhdpJuNBJZCLSx/StWm7+DI1g pgw9EUDA432j+nTnFgixcQQif1PxeMJWzroHTjA68Tvv2zlLsKAnMMdf8fDGqliSCsFQbBYBEVw +3N2ceq95IPoYPECs= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:23a0:b0:539:ccfd:8f36 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-53a15229f40mr807363e87.28.1729234142808; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 23:49:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEXM5EAQajoqC9zVTL6KNqRV/pACC6ak4xikppAvvL01QBV1gElT4eScap3Mxl66wq9+tO2FLitNdgRp4fUDj4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:23a0:b0:539:ccfd:8f36 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-53a15229f40mr807347e87.28.1729234142396; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 23:49:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20241016081824.1808433-8-wang.junlong1@zte.com.cn> <20241018051819.1906108-1-wang.junlong1@zte.com.cn> In-Reply-To: <20241018051819.1906108-1-wang.junlong1@zte.com.cn> From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 08:48:49 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [v6,9/9] net/zxdh: add zxdh dev configure ops To: Junlong Wang Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stephen@networkplumber.org, ferruh.yigit@amd.com, wang.yong19@zte.com.cn X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Hello Junlong, On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 7:21=E2=80=AFAM Junlong Wang wrote: > > Hi, Maintainer > > iol-unit-amd64-testing/ Debian 12 | FAIL > DPDK:fast-tests / bitops_autotest FAIL 1.72 s (exit status 255 or si= gnal 127 SIGinvalid) > > Do we need to solve this error? We haven't found the detailed reason = for the error in the output log. I noticed that the patches submitted by ot= hers also have this error. It was a false positive when testing your series (on top of next-net repo at the time) and you can ignore this failure. This is fixed in the main repo with: 899cffe059b8 ("test/bitops: fix 32-bit atomic test spurious failure"). next-net was rebased recently and contains the fix. --=20 David Marchand