From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA88A0A0F; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:49:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA549141C74; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:49:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD14F141C54 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:49:51 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1618566591; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xYuFTU4+X1GERPr0EiAYDOinnWJiorwmiSmxksk2vyw=; b=AmAIX+UycRTH5s094Y0StUnGB7nAUrbkm7kJjDwcH7BnkfWE4UpZ1rj7lvAX0IKkeuKVNz OqBUrMGD7tSadoz23I2c1v8ajFtiXNvGw+YUr0vgQJt0cHNfF30yLR27j1jp7Y9u7U6JIC 7KMIGqDtK4TJzIBxrlDzCo1anW35wK4= Received: from mail-vk1-f197.google.com (mail-vk1-f197.google.com [209.85.221.197]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-238-gyeOAysCMXefhqSOsQZgug-1; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 05:49:49 -0400 X-MC-Unique: gyeOAysCMXefhqSOsQZgug-1 Received: by mail-vk1-f197.google.com with SMTP id j1-20020a1f23010000b02901d1049fedd2so2373486vkj.6 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 02:49:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xYuFTU4+X1GERPr0EiAYDOinnWJiorwmiSmxksk2vyw=; b=URLfjqInjnJtvUgzWIKm9AjWEitaCUsDvIfkHIGDlNKEPN9DnRvNa2ZGUeTNpsxICo zaCdkH/0nebTEuxeuDKs27hiHrgqBLKWlEytYHhpBW3L90lDvorYkP4Ovi1BBCa1QIHX Cz0eWarHrw/xAD39RSZjSqKaNhCd2/V77Povn2qE3rCV5+NiRF6Vl0tTercc5AC5D+qd +vqhejDtalirqzlCQWDXrC60TUSRcDhDGcovJJd/I2euq5WFJvsIlCD7ngmpCLXh6Ovj 99EjWr5c7R8AH3i3wB7HVworXUwyIMFuoDy74IVfi/ZsHMsf75vDYY+dBj8qgNFKhGzb FITw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532TiXMQ/eYTM0A46Q7LZvU2NIKKpKKECefKrHuStd8ElmKE0C2g teKhocMnLaOEuKkchrEsf9zbwfyi/p1C3i6ivens2tX+WjkCU4u7u55Kcn2lyruO/qn0UigqRCq ZH3WCqfP91ihpjrl1LBE= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:aa43:: with SMTP id t64mr6175241vke.22.1618566588800; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 02:49:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyKlTRlIuC9/2LTbg81rmCIHQbRVEGK3a/zJ2HeH+/48K8hoLNPBjzomPizxI/WWM6rNdxN0QZN5/193LwxQLI= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:aa43:: with SMTP id t64mr6175231vke.22.1618566588594; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 02:49:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210415163230.22263-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> <1882583.4QfryVaJDx@thomas> In-Reply-To: <1882583.4QfryVaJDx@thomas> From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:49:37 +0200 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Juraj_Linke=C5=A1?= , "dev@dpdk.org" , "mdr@ashroe.eu" , Aaron Conole , Michael Santana , Honnappa Nagarahalli , Bruce Richardson Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] ci: fix ABI reference generation X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 11:20 AM Thomas Monjalon wrot= e: > > 16/04/2021 11:17, David Marchand: > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 8:39 AM Juraj Linke=C5=A1 wrote: > > > > > > > > Stick to a compatible configuration passing -Dmachine=3Ddefault. > > > > > > > > Note: the breakage was not seen earlier this week as I guess the CI= workers are > > > > using a cached ABI reference for v20.11. > > > > > > > > Fixes: 5b3a6ca6fd28 ("build: alias default build as generic") > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: David Marchand > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Juraj Linke=C5=A1 > > > > > > Do we want to change this back to -Dmachine=3Dgeneric after next rele= ase? > > > > This seems fine to me. > > If we change back in 21.08, we won't be able to test 21.08 > against 20.11 or 21.02, right? > Wouldn't be better to wait 21.11? I considered this too, but here, in Travis/GHA, we test only against the n-1 release. --=20 David Marchand