From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACF66A04DE; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 10:52:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889D1A8F5; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 10:52:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D8D8A8F5 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 10:52:24 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1603443143; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5IV8cnkYRTMEwYkwapN8/Ruo4Eo7XPYfECBk2BYXwac=; b=NS8v/6p488b9WZXoBRWUf9yhpWT6N/o2TS+t+iIVzG0MAtbWl6SwI8RgJttbJVBMS0PwzU Iud+NufLmJKZNbU3NXq/1rYh45pARJOXPrHHaydsCQ3b5A8UHeNklM4rmQ6ee5HKp2UR5L rK5F+FvGqp/1Ab4I/q26dQCFQJm0G4o= Received: from mail-vs1-f72.google.com (mail-vs1-f72.google.com [209.85.217.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-483-OnGdjKSdMGSRULyGQEgQbg-1; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 04:52:21 -0400 X-MC-Unique: OnGdjKSdMGSRULyGQEgQbg-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f72.google.com with SMTP id u12so141538vsh.18 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 01:52:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5IV8cnkYRTMEwYkwapN8/Ruo4Eo7XPYfECBk2BYXwac=; b=asji0nD0CCBa9xJb9Kp3+2dZix6Qvxdd3SlguEeCSc/fshXgDqLaeALG6mlZoNnvXC 8JKnE+iCgju+yg4rJvnJukE+H2m2If57ffYqxgyXaqC7gsbk8A+w1Yl1J2G6Bc/r3N0Q H87qjz0b96MRKtQzaatA5PYAQLrljvXAGZ7xeyLZXMu4ZU5yGCFEwl5Ch1MTx9CAbegK 3Pvx0Aoo3t9cAtmXIUoa5X5CnZrl5SaPxiLygvMFMo6N9vZulQjpRQTEZCMGs8iRf2Uc 4JQRiMx4r40983eFu67PkzarstgqbMXwSNmUO5+ws7XdlQO6SkYzv9X0cqswC30C54KZ SN9A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5302tHO9QerwcPIMgPIVa7v+Wd59m7BgR5ijsdYlz3Jzs2eRuI3K f8DBHlYOhHLZArqFtpahBtWTJJstsvDVpaOJwGzsRlrFqzpyd7wo2tEb4FBNFoG2V9hWOZtVPvB Zcx/fdDTRXv72JZeKOxE= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:784d:: with SMTP id y13mr570211uaq.86.1603443140985; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 01:52:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyb+4qBac+RfXjcsyFqh7DCYQqYPFvypfm5kVdUBhnJDF+vcMoT37BNK89X84WOERhZewUuN3vYeRHWXTiW/V4= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:784d:: with SMTP id y13mr570198uaq.86.1603443140650; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 01:52:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200608075836.3609-3-ibtisam.tariq@emumba.com> <20200713095730.10331-1-ibtisam.tariq@emumba.com> <20200713095730.10331-3-ibtisam.tariq@emumba.com> In-Reply-To: <20200713095730.10331-3-ibtisam.tariq@emumba.com> From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 10:52:09 +0200 Message-ID: To: Ibtisam Tariq Cc: Cristian Dumitrescu , Radu Nicolau , Akhil Goyal , "Singh, Jasvinder" , dev , Fan Zhang Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: Remove the re-implementation of inet_pton X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 11:59 AM Ibtisam Tariq wrote: > > inet_pton4 and inet_pton6 was reimplemented. Replace implementation of > inet_pton4 and inet_pton6 with libc inet_pton function > > Bugzilla ID: 365 > Fixes: 0d547ed03717 ("examples/ipsec-secgw: support configuration file") > Cc: roy.fan.zhang@intel.com > > Reported-by: David Marchand > Signed-off-by: Ibtisam Tariq Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev For the series, Acked-by: David Marchand And applied, thanks for the cleanup Ibtisam. -- David Marchand