From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D70A0C41; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 17:20:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E72F4121C; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 17:20:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B7741216 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 17:20:54 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1634656854; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=JAignQc5nJxxZPW2SkSlJZ3TKbsEvHNsOFsELpPnIww=; b=cOmhBC+UIyF0Lxk6UoZ/6XGLuQ+XiYBlJKgcgq9nTAwxoUDEr9oa/XHXH+xv8tiT3tlThA dgDfBOgYXITHA905z9o90mEGl5W0eW3g4FuSWtkVqcQHt472cMMrDeu/bxq7shR+Py0nY8 8iLjqBDzFu0WeH4/xE8vhUIVGlQDsMY= Received: from mail-lf1-f70.google.com (mail-lf1-f70.google.com [209.85.167.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-242-DfoGKPP4Mh2TE9vtDjTJsw-1; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 11:20:52 -0400 X-MC-Unique: DfoGKPP4Mh2TE9vtDjTJsw-1 Received: by mail-lf1-f70.google.com with SMTP id br42-20020a056512402a00b003fd94a74905so1571683lfb.7 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 08:20:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JAignQc5nJxxZPW2SkSlJZ3TKbsEvHNsOFsELpPnIww=; b=Oho3fOoXVy4vEgefFuOTVYmXEZVWwmdKibzKUuw9FRO0ZNt9d5tEBugzjQ94mNbfML aUU63BwTz94X++KLhcBkY37ybH7TZ626Ap+LUkrLSI3rl4fAlC1N8Y11WyaVVwbf/l7d g7sDlj3YO8MX1+PG7jJ24aDuwXh8lbF/OAsYzeTBr/II+gGcuCRXdA8QzSb5OCP7J915 72t6QGDmi2tMPvxyaqihDjKQkPrN1HirHauYFijdNs+eDyP9aYQDtpl9Fi4u/GYTnI8V Py3I0eKvkXB63Q29KaUY2BXgD0UZizV0A05ueS5NikWMIUhGtHsKRFFZbY592qT0hF7r ISmw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531XARIdI3rndTKIEBJnBCqnW4Fmu8hUIK59Ge23VMB5kL5puQf0 7NFg/lxcLm5c6HKYjnviV+kfMJtPQUKiKi1VIPdbmspghWvbWNzOR7oH9ifF4X1OuuxKQp8Syi5 wA5Nt9Z+Z4BGGPAfDjdo= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b528:: with SMTP id z8mr7248851ljm.55.1634656850797; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 08:20:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzIHi46uFBDjDQ2KdH6ioySXUacRMAqOc5H0ySHf4l/1U3ChRSppaI1JPJh9/NBasQndO+kvhPQTQ6U4KXV9Gc= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b528:: with SMTP id z8mr7248832ljm.55.1634656850598; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 08:20:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211019101207.1451058-4-zhihongx.peng@intel.com> <20211019135841.2004819-1-zhihongx.peng@intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 17:20:39 +0200 Message-ID: To: "Peng, ZhihongX" Cc: "Burakov, Anatoly" , "Ananyev, Konstantin" , "stephen@networkplumber.org" , "Dumitrescu, Cristian" , "Mcnamara, John" , "Richardson, Bruce" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Lin, Xueqin" Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 1/4] Enable ASan Address Sanitization X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 4:50 PM Peng, ZhihongX wrote: > The v12 version has been submitted, and patch 3 and 4 has been acked. > > V10 information: > > I have compiled passed on the x86/arm/ppc platforms, directory targets as below : > build-arm64-bluefield build-arm64-host-clang build-clang-shared build-gcc-shared build-ppc64le-power8 > build-arm64-dpaa build-arm64-octeontx2 build-clang-static build-gcc-static build-x86-generic > > We do not support the windows platform due to standard google document(https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/AddressSanitizer) > also not support this. > We also sent our cross-compilation log to you in an other email. Passed to run unit test for dpdk-testpmd simple on x86 platform. > What else is blocking the process ? > What's any action we should do for the code merge? High appreciate for your check and feedback. This series has seen so many revisions (often numbered the same, and while I was writting this reply, here is a new revision) in the last days that I put it at the end of my queue simply to wait for a stable state. By the way, simply pinging me to get your patches merged is easy, but if you care about the dpdk project, there are other series that need reviews/checks when merging, you are welcome to review and test patches. -- David Marchand