From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C07F48950; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 15:45:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E1B402C9; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 15:45:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 673CB400D5 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 15:45:54 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1761054353; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mHL88CLPrWkIba0oC1qr9pLBOnbvEULFbs1rA+ZdoUQ=; b=SKCftPvVg1zeDGBhLHtXTxe0C3W303cK7wCRzWK3KFlsq0hHYf7A91hFSBU7oxeLH85B7N lBBpcqUp9ka2FgeA8+BW5OEK325OJ0wJ0iZ6fJ6jhUZq7PDX+s+VLBT2KN0Xrlhd3yBqb3 gTvqk5Pz/j72qgXe9d6PGRSS/dz7TNs= Received: from mail-lj1-f199.google.com (mail-lj1-f199.google.com [209.85.208.199]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-363-1Op71vG-OuadgpVGvS7TQQ-1; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 09:45:52 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 1Op71vG-OuadgpVGvS7TQQ-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 1Op71vG-OuadgpVGvS7TQQ_1761054351 Received: by mail-lj1-f199.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-368348cf7d5so35878791fa.0 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 06:45:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1761054351; x=1761659151; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=mHL88CLPrWkIba0oC1qr9pLBOnbvEULFbs1rA+ZdoUQ=; b=GtHSxmXVPazWiCMx8xlv8FR3a9q5JjYYkEhSN/3jux0omP9aXoI1vSqLBl/Ok/99/A cQTs6w5nwum/kOrty6bM0ka5qQGK2UT1IpfBDIj24MYGm37w6N2mGih0xOpcqMEiyD2B MjurxTIIZ88w34nhROsn9sttdmvS99ikBEw+vdSVJ74b8Us2rL/VIe8bkKZcfXK0nnYc EBZhAqYsEUevj39fBOTtJ4/MaN/ajA3t5m88RXrC7sFHeL51pa0S8fJD0Tb2TROaU/gt wX3GT9KjMbCEgCVTGccSSyW4l1c4I2HN1ZVyX4y+4h4jWxNfKrI5UJxKlFHyoXeawPdF RNuw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxufHL9ReXDvjkC10/M0rEWPUyqhuTU8Y/PhUJrHg1JRIxgK542 gKsuhJKu8YnHVoB8THooseWC9VJ91KgTkLEEkkUXMKwDwjkeQQa6y/ZRrbXM8XWKhKoudl/psZc 1Cns1XtCnNIsIT2OvCqnzdUIaCfbgqNpgn2JgCnKYi4W1qYNjWz7PS+imZUH+J1+rId4arOBwAK QvZ2jIZSNwNze6ObxOhL4= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsr5FhE1e5lhNmHYqLg5LAyuTfu3yYYFUoNm74FLCohyJ5ZfD9bOUDsxhEiQoG 91uAB92xJI5vBLp3gM5k4fI1BRL2a7a5QM5hNz7R1Brt9nfHpoF5ZeamcVbDcPGwnyleMnk2s6j V5IQfxeBhZO5M3uJi6pc4U3B8M4rbAqLfE5zpGqJjQI9AyGWmFBII6hSIVhA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:1546:10b0:591:ebc3:a686 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-591ebc3ab84mr629827e87.44.1761054351013; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 06:45:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEUsW0hG4j0ToaPr9fcPE6GbDbpeQ5LNkCsHyBWEF0bn2CqtT4Ac004E1+uKmXV1U/YmYAM04OiWpQ9hIgg9AM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:1546:10b0:591:ebc3:a686 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-591ebc3ab84mr629819e87.44.1761054350586; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 06:45:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20250825083229.919586-1-ashwini@wisig.com> In-Reply-To: <20250825083229.919586-1-ashwini@wisig.com> From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 15:45:38 +0200 X-Gm-Features: AS18NWB_Zrbq8Qv38LqcTnJrSfQccl1mv6JR0FDQhuGHkOzGUy61ZpR2k-57dw0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] vduse: fix typo in struct vduse_iova_info comment To: Ashwini Sahu Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Maxime Coquelin X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: efovcDcl8aQ8DY3HRqxK-tgjluKVwm-btRZN8hQkSsM_1761054351 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 at 10:32, Ashwini Sahu wrote: > > Fixes a typo in the kernel header comment for struct vduse_iova_info > where "IOVA region" was incorrectly repeated. > > Signed-off-by: Ashwini Sahu As I said in the other thread [1], I prefer we don't "fix" uapi headers in DPDK. This needs to be fixed in the kernel itself. 1: https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/CAJFAV8wqC1PpVvRoxdRpb-8v5FY90KOfKuTGLL_CvbUnpdjsRg@mail.gmail.com/ -- David Marchand