From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1D445895; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 10:15:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37832427D2; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 10:15:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B37427C5 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 10:14:54 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1724919294; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2Zn3mzbeT2GRK15GZUjLMADt9Wq1ZlILWYxOZ8+S6iE=; b=W7faT31Y8gdAulBQFA+K8hBLGnchNt3t+TGL6cidmaygLeR+G+hapSVqGmeZe+L7m2+Iel xoaUuoTm+LzV8tRzhTWJ+gDzNj+9yWOl1ksU7Fc8MlL7MtQZayViVvQjUf4dqwRwgBLdPX aYtU3ygdokH1RIPqFLqAVsu1phmJ6mw= Received: from mail-lf1-f72.google.com (mail-lf1-f72.google.com [209.85.167.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-643-bp9gAyGcMgGMUaltyy0hkg-1; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 04:14:52 -0400 X-MC-Unique: bp9gAyGcMgGMUaltyy0hkg-1 Received: by mail-lf1-f72.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-5334af2a79eso442773e87.1 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 01:14:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1724919291; x=1725524091; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=2Zn3mzbeT2GRK15GZUjLMADt9Wq1ZlILWYxOZ8+S6iE=; b=ZxVpsIiNmU2jX14JT23AXJBGrO9WYufOsMer9UHW3wIqJm+nUZndDBJlkVoim/CvBc Hh5uV5a80CV2UCCsklfJD1Z+oBBu9Y7F4gy7ULaQDWRx9qBkgzTTcaldlF7DRhZplFPR ON/8eQJf6q35FN7s7TzzBxosl31+tAqO+RIQnw5mDCdkDsmhjo7Q4ZoNMMyM3YnoFjSy K76Nsfa4dshYSxm6ZRrEAfwSwQ1noeKrt5vcYCCOwNFl1wRPM5zFIILGRVdHvkDoNcj3 mO+MFFzXF6bde9w02BCuL/FZh3b3a0PQbgJqD1BtKvy/dzmHfjFBkqx+ymJh03s00Kxw 5CLg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzesE6PBo3tDItdk06w0rYVxfu+rHVuSmBTfT464V3qr2MpHRKq kMMTYebRgQgEdqCnYPqAh0Rcn/A+PKth0yKDNAWH9Gn4Sw36tNIojE9ktxyH2hC/nf32kwaYQ8G gW3EkbCq4/sRMAzBpEr098/wRfWYE8uv9U+XgAGs586vJoqmqTEW80ZIfLh/eGT9TpGrFUL53Ch 4LHjsV/jv93QSjjWE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:1245:b0:531:8f2f:8ae7 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-5353e5755d9mr1581133e87.25.1724919291357; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 01:14:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGVMR7jk4QGMytpTK9x1PwoWlJJ8vNInCIyI4rvrIs6qqKuvHGmYkI5/q3ltID3s+q1FvgFpyJ+d+UzGneTrGk= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:1245:b0:531:8f2f:8ae7 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-5353e5755d9mr1581107e87.25.1724919290852; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 01:14:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20231214060819.2121735-1-zhichaox.zeng@intel.com> <20231215032841.2455798-1-zhichaox.zeng@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20231215032841.2455798-1-zhichaox.zeng@intel.com> From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 10:14:38 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net/iavf: support rte flow with mask for FDIR To: Zhichao Zeng , Bruce Richardson Cc: dev@dpdk.org, qi.z.zhang@intel.com, Jingjing Wu , Beilei Xing , Ian Stokes , "Mcnamara, John" X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Hello, On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 4:19=E2=80=AFAM Zhichao Zeng wrote: > > This patch supports rte flow with mask for FDIR, including > eth/ipv4/ipv6/tcp/udp flow items, where src/dst for ipv4/ipv6 > and sport/dport for tcp/udp are realized by switch filter. > > Signed-off-by: Zhichao Zeng Is this supposed to work with an upstream kernel? Is this patch supposed to get merged at some point in DPDK? --=20 David Marchand