From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62CC4A32A2 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 16:12:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC8FF1E945; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 16:12:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.61]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C281E940 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 16:12:29 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1571926349; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=A0h6ryNJaTHNFQrTrSwQ+dt57P1+JcibPe/p08jvpAA=; b=PlYJj2Koz/Nm/oOwuqaUQVzlsGYazawlWYWBzu+c/YCRK8HjYQt5fMW3hVFfGa7ZZx+w1T 0LeZKNPIdj5MgNEMHOPKV18fOQG+XF1IXhYQ9Qg+hgzWdB+lB6O8JaLr1YUAyKRBAVOIe0 hSzPZAqdJ83hAfOfQRLImTANZs0Br5s= Received: from mail-ua1-f72.google.com (mail-ua1-f72.google.com [209.85.222.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-338-l6tKRL__Oe-I2lF-RZFixg-1; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 10:12:26 -0400 Received: by mail-ua1-f72.google.com with SMTP id a32so1408244uad.22 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 07:12:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Y5hhtjkbKjk3vDh80+SwofjqvnhhbbzPA1UEL84WpOc=; b=QPLjZaOFsQBxVBgrtCyRRvXBWp5kTlHl37U7dJNsqgUJoMndcDdx62EWOKusVUY44+ g85VJEAx2GomDFHlm34hlBU5cffvtTF7erZKKZSNSUTxVOZMLpswfhfIIicDVvr+PGRH AVKYi3OkC70S6l8LPBHi2xCsW56wpcedunFQw4kXOZVNkbMyLbkNnT8Ebopdtre9xFRA 6rpuecN8CRVVmeDj35zQ178QHzlz2JNxK8Vg0OJARRUV1W443ngNflw949SRB+9qbA0j P9s26mGDfzXJ2/2YBgpTlEGNzS75Zv8sy0B2myyJ7w04Gf0GksSkSIDoJw5VOICuIwde URtA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV5XKQu47cdkXbWDG6tGKUiLjMK9gFa9druBeeIAGyjPUfeRF1C tInj5WbiMOn3PtBpVFsPTAo8AA9m7V40Z8goENNr1TiBzvXUoj/396Qi+O6vcX2LHb7f2vhgOsw elgwK1xw7Ow9jCVLFD0M= X-Received: by 2002:a67:e88b:: with SMTP id x11mr8830946vsn.180.1571926345508; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 07:12:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqygH28LMlF8eQ4iPU4w208QSR8TPJYYyyZd9Aew6VHPaXe70Mq9BzMEyppJ5V1mqeJvvgnQsTIlDCspbkwBqHE= X-Received: by 2002:a67:e88b:: with SMTP id x11mr8830913vsn.180.1571926345091; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 07:12:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191003131918.30970-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <20191024133145.12246-1-ciara.power@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20191024133145.12246-1-ciara.power@intel.com> From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 16:12:13 +0200 Message-ID: To: Ciara Power Cc: dev , techboard@dpdk.org X-MC-Unique: l6tKRL__Oe-I2lF-RZFixg-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/6] remove a few example applications X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 3:35 PM Ciara Power wrote: > As discussed by the DPDK technical board e.g. [1][2] and on the DPDK > mailing list [3], we have a lot of example applications shipped with > DPDK - a number which increases with each DPDK release, and not all of > which are probably needed any more. Therefore, this set removes 5 > example applications from the repository. > > v2: Remove the table listing sample applications > > [1] https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2019-May/132288.html > [2] https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2019-June/135847.html > [3] https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2019-July/138676.html > > > Bruce Richardson (2): > examples/exception_path: remove example from DPDK > examples/l3fwd-vf: remove example from DPDK > > Ciara Power (4): > doc: remove unnecessary sample app guide table > examples/quota-watermark: remove example from DPDK > examples/netmap-compat: remove example from DPDK > examples/load_balancer: remove example from DPDK - No need to repeat "from DPDK" in the patch title. - The conflicts are trivial but please, rebase this series on master. - Can you add an entry in the release notes for each removal? Thanks. --=20 David Marchand