From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A62AAA046B
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 11:16:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58BE74C6C;
	Fri, 28 Jun 2019 11:16:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-ua1-f42.google.com (mail-ua1-f42.google.com
 [209.85.222.42]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6AF61E2F
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 11:16:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-ua1-f42.google.com with SMTP id j8so1935324uan.6
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:16:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=uHkq9TjjgFxruxHXt5SVzb7+pCztkSFGKl37XjMVPn4=;
 b=PKd71wL8CEhFbMdHXTyB/gzZvyJ5zAFR05J/A41AszFcFEZ1OBAT7njYSEWg/wRdRu
 FebezleBkGjAj3FiBfQhixpwOnEwYkCopMqwONldehinHzRTE1Qs/AJ8BkDfcIKvNFGf
 W5xb6TV3VRLEywqtpGmk09HFcDRirNVJwESbwGAXSef8fjiAz2cIDTvI5Z+Zw6Ucsrbk
 jV5vmzapvJ1Kf4PlLzHnAjy3A+Oz/xiK/RnTYK78GnjtGwfXB7RJtgIl7gOfvaKP0Q6P
 2+AeBQ2LF9TfCnc7bncBzHlrWwZzXZivtSBXVP0cY7P4JVsMJJfD/fwl7eOXrtPBEkb+
 iXqQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXBFe05PEpMtGqJCt5Cxpi5QXoAuWucdEDNG/4pRqW0ByaccDOF
 rDiY7BLvBnV+3ZvfaRgO0VNoHur3d/mk9npg37OB2kge
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzzoSd2yL4niaqUeOYAf80PZVnhtkUrbLf9b6EoSSdAziJH2/Xy/QakgdGKLuV5oQeoSH9z4FGukZDjKhMVEp0=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:b99:: with SMTP id c25mr5205204uak.53.1561713385967;
 Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:16:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190628034406.5399-1-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
 <20190628034406.5399-2-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190628034406.5399-2-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 11:16:15 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8ydEKmzcHEw3jytboQPo4CVBOpx18JbEfoBP_tZRwM=8A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, ruifeng.wang@arm.com, nd <nd@arm.com>, 
 dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 2/2] test/rcu: address test
	case failure
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 5:44 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli <
honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> wrote:

> Test case for rte_rcu_qsbr_get_memsize is written specifically
> for 128 threads. Do not use RTE_MAX_LCORE as it changes for
> different configurations.
>

Does it mean this test can only work on arm with 256 lcores?
How many cores does this test require?


-- 
David Marchand