From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57741A0547;
	Fri, 14 Feb 2020 16:08:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C556100C;
	Fri, 14 Feb 2020 16:08:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-2.mimecast.com
 [205.139.110.61]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1848F72
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 16:08:22 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
 s=mimecast20190719; t=1581692901;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
 bh=Z/r8wJFinA5VEWdshTJ2ld2it5LCQhcHRzYyu5yxyDk=;
 b=g9LlRva3yyKH2UpWkjyOABXVu3/a5bAWfIIyJgfti3XVrCzG3YvPTY33cFFxrRsxZm+3sE
 PNziF87rMt9RFcKm4SQUGuX319EA6JCS6QMfWUOOYR3BOSC8+Xmn4CdVm7eUXnxVCB0e+U
 mrnV2DWb8joh4VDaHc0A+Io08x5onzk=
Received: from mail-ua1-f71.google.com (mail-ua1-f71.google.com
 [209.85.222.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id
 us-mta-44-i3BNCNf-NGm3z1ir4T_s5g-1; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 10:08:16 -0500
Received: by mail-ua1-f71.google.com with SMTP id u11so941142ual.5
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 07:08:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=h4SmWzSFcAbNxfvPcSB8IgESNrB0yOpNv3d3bgdW428=;
 b=YBc6qRTLvZI2UBn6c4q3t0TS5fgmz4NTzpLaExVQwlAU7NI9am+L854T8NuF1fCSi5
 nNVm+OHVJVAMtNdSn8+R3qpjD/LwdL7+SKlYs1afBZy73nPIXi+VtCw3CGEAadaA794/
 hq22PtxJHlDVMQ12Vf7xexgTAGjRW2nmSfNLSEBFeOSfJSXf0P/nVVK8qVOTYtw+qCHT
 hoVrpeson1s699posbCO5Z9fO6GSc340Axn+N2S616Xgtp6D2kno5HjIhZ7ufzcumFr0
 gYzQOqMvRYJs5QUHlMCK1CV8OLvzfPnD1fY1zaOAT8p8wDTJZidG0Tr9cGOuy+B4/Ogj
 vLug==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW1gCRFN3HM72ULU79CUSyZJMcZQrptDL94gacHmjfg9dmg3BbM
 BkNXSic6eXtE5Q3C/trkfip4C+VjsBzibu/fNnIjlpYzu/wcxHu6bb5DefItQF1geIniKsuUCR2
 mC5c7Vsx1itBljo5qc/A=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:6796:: with SMTP id v22mr1736521uar.41.1581692895557; 
 Fri, 14 Feb 2020 07:08:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw6iK9MCRs4UIvW3isPd0HK4q+siO8HWq0ZWLhEvyXi/d9gdD3gUEU/R3s4CO1eOv4WW6Z97pJcs/6tWl3AU4E=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:6796:: with SMTP id v22mr1736499uar.41.1581692895108; 
 Fri, 14 Feb 2020 07:08:15 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20191113214346.33749-1-yasufum.o@gmail.com>
 <20191127084826.3519-1-yasufum.o@gmail.com>
 <20191127084826.3519-2-yasufum.o@gmail.com>
 <2dc8c11a-ec17-7b26-b79e-bed4e6063f6b@intel.com>
 <6ea0b73a-1d38-dbe1-2142-9ab4fec594e7@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <6ea0b73a-1d38-dbe1-2142-9ab4fec594e7@gmail.com>
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 16:08:03 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8ydhqpwR+FDY19NcXCD=bF6qxwbqZ3jHv6rmdbk7pvWWQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yasufumi Ogawa <yasufum.o@gmail.com>, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>, 
 "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>
X-MC-Unique: i3BNCNf-NGm3z1ir4T_s5g-1
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/1] fbarray: fix duplicated fbarray file
	in secondary
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 8:46 AM Yasufumi Ogawa <yasufum.o@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Could I confirm that this patch is going to be merged in 20.02?

Sorry, but I can't take this patch in 20.02.
It breaks compilation on FreeBSD.
http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2019-November/109435.html


I am still unconvinced on the need to change the size to something so
huge to accommodate with this new use case (secondary processes in
containers).
Why can't we truncate the container hostname so that it fits in 64 bytes?


Thomas, opinion?

--=20
David Marchand