From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64D9A0A02; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 16:02:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419D1140E0C; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 16:02:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D678B140DDC for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 16:02:12 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1616684532; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KXXnoBIxiKdVboH0J/kHpFsFYn0IYF2rqcXAdpKhO6E=; b=gk41iSTSj/tjIUlbPTYwdAaQBvfw4n62/cdzKfBAuVSaU8Aya7pXww0Q4k3NkqpxApCjgC SNotFu45vRvkUEnriwm4opp07Z817DxhvkYrANmDbE1QY1yx1jxodu0+K3ixuHmJSdTj78 SYXtvVVLv4td2wm+tav3G8LpybdPHeY= Received: from mail-vk1-f199.google.com (mail-vk1-f199.google.com [209.85.221.199]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-197-uUJuOYPsPrOgrGg6G9CkUA-1; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 11:02:07 -0400 X-MC-Unique: uUJuOYPsPrOgrGg6G9CkUA-1 Received: by mail-vk1-f199.google.com with SMTP id z68so796745vkd.22 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 08:02:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KXXnoBIxiKdVboH0J/kHpFsFYn0IYF2rqcXAdpKhO6E=; b=KecexyOXl/ma5u6IRR0a9+4/jmMlhInQDMT/xIh1cz260MlW/tfzHI0q5AeKkBtsrC iJXXY2qSINWu46swGFa0rahE1i/DKK6LTrW0RJts6+qe9dD65gdtZ/nb48JgM/eFqD6h mSd8Eu+hfi6I79UVK+hKlx0EkX4Zc7IrugElheur/kdWic7db/buYKu2o+LKvX/EWeGN phI/At+8I/wQpSdxVdjm+YiMmld1Er849jNgdcJSLImqgZxDZWImxWid/1EQ8YBCaUMY X86FYotUQbXXsjbZoKczmA9HIBhhQ5y5VZwA/uVNHLFMKb0l8qXFCXcyg/5X9192Vt+K ABPA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530pHZjD4/W+Oxj1O52mUevEbjwksuzPhv1p3VU9PqLQnN1FeTRC zMMC3KG1AHYG8+EktycMmfnWN7zloNlvofgICdzf3Op75UXWdc/ATtthNT4/cjWyCzPUtSdzLYA mfZTR5L9lPVfslz6DBWk= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:390d:: with SMTP id b13mr4989913uaw.53.1616684526934; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 08:02:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJziYgv1KYx+t61BiTttzVfN3/7KzGnppt+E6yJB7Q2G2ChHNnxsSGdLrE+ufzcGALH03/pOTnQQTS1nuZdfDHA= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:390d:: with SMTP id b13mr4989890uaw.53.1616684526782; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 08:02:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210225170238.15581-1-pbhagavatula@marvell.com> <5442273.ffSK4IfYTI@thomas> <5158764.JivBLqzAeP@thomas> In-Reply-To: <5158764.JivBLqzAeP@thomas> From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 16:01:55 +0100 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon , Pavan Nikhilesh Cc: Jerin Jacob , "Kinsella, Ray" , dpdk-dev , Harman Kalra , Nithin Dabilpuram , Jerin Jacob Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/7] common/octeontx: enable build only on 64bit Linux X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 3:57 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > In the past we said that depreciating HW support would be considered to be same as an ABI Breakage. > > > > > > > > From the policy ... > > > > "Updates to the minimum hardware requirements, which drop support for hardware which was previously supported, should be treated as an ABI change." > > > > > > So the patches should wait 21.11. > > > Everybody agree? > > > > Looks good to me to postpone. > > The v2 is waiting in patchwork with the status "Deferred": > https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=15885&state=* We need a deprecation notice. -- David Marchand