From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E0BA0C43; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 11:03:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3118540141; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 11:03:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5673240040 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 11:03:44 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1637057023; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Wa/ETR30IXWnwEb+pGjxZD8fLOabJB9a6RI6B3pPqbM=; b=PxG6StXn+0RGE/2AF8TvgaYueIIXXU46muyfRLyQjDma3vk+Ft+mWWEPCIWrvSEMNmW5ck gFEZfsXwBMdqgdKpDD62Ou7qQTLvQcIazgw5AUs/8dsm25vk6WeTfbJuv91sjJnGJdCX8O TXY83uO54QvqwsLwEymYlpRpf0zjvPM= Received: from mail-lj1-f197.google.com (mail-lj1-f197.google.com [209.85.208.197]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-358-EHRbTR7gMy6JrYcUzNaj2A-1; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 05:03:42 -0500 X-MC-Unique: EHRbTR7gMy6JrYcUzNaj2A-1 Received: by mail-lj1-f197.google.com with SMTP id i14-20020a2e864e000000b00218a2c57df8so5994633ljj.20 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 02:03:42 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Wa/ETR30IXWnwEb+pGjxZD8fLOabJB9a6RI6B3pPqbM=; b=ou0SPadHOjZBfZlwnqdfY3qDQSBv/6lFksB9+VC+m6Jn5klu6wMeZDdzR1CPZ3tbOX iimSiF34yzT8zzUQHFaj19SNUawooBOZEC+nOj+7BJQa0x6reNCIQZbLbxVqxj3KasyR sOL9DIYwaMUYgXX1mf/eq2NKmcxeWVl3YATbhVf6ujNF3EbQM4NLRr/qsg4nnJYIL92w b7ZD9t0oLj8N3ejpiioSeZgH+V3IqlnQJHXRYBw5uUFYjp4UGL70JhDQ4w5HhNzBbkJx Cd+gcO5wgxZ2onMRPLirdb+yTNy9LqEy1nhEnqRQBerglYpiyWV2iOUs6Sa1T9o4+PNJ y2cQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533IPsK9/GlGSuyVHlGbRTThrK2DOkldwJsVDu+/qFM8DCtDdPA8 PJrUNSvHZwYhDlsVgFNe8etcdxPfchVxa9MEbZPsJeU6edcGb/hVWlVzXxZStZug/ZRH9J/QMA1 ywv2il3mz2GGAaaZjkOg= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b8cf:: with SMTP id s15mr5610950ljp.297.1637057021183; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 02:03:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJynhRsnhLx1Zh7tA92EzZIZWo8ZYuY83hFzw7cw6qcn+hdspZRNzCy94CEiLa4jc/LRsxJGZ91qBh/S3MBcxc4= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b8cf:: with SMTP id s15mr5610927ljp.297.1637057020929; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 02:03:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211003202448.10908-1-pbhagavatula@marvell.com> <20211105083851.2812-1-pbhagavatula@marvell.com> <20211105083851.2812-3-pbhagavatula@marvell.com> In-Reply-To: <20211105083851.2812-3-pbhagavatula@marvell.com> From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 11:03:30 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] examples/l3fwd: use reserved addresses for EM mode To: Pavan Nikhilesh Cc: Conor Walsh , Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran , dev Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 9:39 AM wrote: > > From: Pavan Nikhilesh > > The l3fwd example should use the reserved IPv4/v6 reserved address > ranges defined in RFC5735, RFC5180 and RFC863 discard protocol for > the port number in the exact match mode of L3 forwarding. > > Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh For the series, Reviewed-by: David Marchand I reworded a bit the RN update. I also split the EM mention in the RN, from patch 1 to patch 3. Applied, thanks. -- David Marchand