From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DE3E430BC; Mon, 21 Aug 2023 09:13:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1679F40EE3; Mon, 21 Aug 2023 09:13:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A67C040A7D for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2023 09:13:11 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1692601991; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=uW1gesSXrxLv6V+Kq9loWmndto7egQ5Y3Jcuum5nnug=; b=I91VlqDYerNFs3GUcUwL2bU5XzycVkvBKf3PgSTGRW76s1uRHYcWEff34UbxRsIMwoG5JX Z1/+FAIgV2Lc6UWa5nH3r6f5Dn8obD6F4CmIC/rx9gWque29xWKuZxQLUYZtbolDmBJm+5 D80JwYLDBwsk67a0oU7g/L668cDNRYs= Received: from mail-lj1-f200.google.com (mail-lj1-f200.google.com [209.85.208.200]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-202-dqywrRInP2e6KKS0jtU0hg-1; Mon, 21 Aug 2023 03:13:09 -0400 X-MC-Unique: dqywrRInP2e6KKS0jtU0hg-1 Received: by mail-lj1-f200.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2bcc2fd542bso3367391fa.3 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2023 00:13:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1692601988; x=1693206788; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=uW1gesSXrxLv6V+Kq9loWmndto7egQ5Y3Jcuum5nnug=; b=h5xWrha4Ef0cSr+YSbUyS0ufUgrpxfIjj2hTl96/tf/Y3yRnwTk3csOzS617YWAIYV m8RGkvfu0JDfZfyfnjQeezgK6wJt7yWBYJsFjD165cx3RjUD6Mj8fqwWYYq5rSfLrHxy 3GewYEC5ie1+f/mR2lD/TLKGZBYIN+tFA4+S4BxXuOLH7Zse/gmjXVWUb/s5z5YobmJi 49IMbOp2pnLzfW7PxdG+IRF9kCPK0nri+xZzzpK/Nb8Oqs6udRim3UzAZwW1Uqpd1p1D ZmSzLgpPeBbtepenoE6S1Soz8EhgX+25xDKKBK7KTjIqjNI4HDvp0u0DJLyIgT0IP6xD dThg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzewYB1d/AuDeWyCZaXRwAaGZK0bcarR+kG0MlCXIWmNpaDJXAd ka2A05h9GF3Yi0KHRklGBR/ncHgaoRh4VtlHt+pdKEiE1Yy8hmvKlfXo+ceI/mKYKXNh5FDENHR L0GYQTTvFyh5N6TpmblE= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9d96:0:b0:2b6:c2e4:a57a with SMTP id c22-20020a2e9d96000000b002b6c2e4a57amr4416244ljj.38.1692601988519; Mon, 21 Aug 2023 00:13:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG9iMlFwpQH6w+C7PAA8TyC6lVEzA9a8zEdRVXDetfVntBztbuH8XRY7LligTFRXNbCNYo7qEM57CfUTJ86Tu8= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9d96:0:b0:2b6:c2e4:a57a with SMTP id c22-20020a2e9d96000000b002b6c2e4a57amr4416229ljj.38.1692601988249; Mon, 21 Aug 2023 00:13:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230721115125.55137-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <20230815151053.996469-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <20230815151053.996469-5-bruce.richardson@intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 09:12:56 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/10] app/test: build using per-file dependency matrix To: Patrick Robb Cc: Bruce Richardson , dev@dpdk.org, ci@dpdk.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Morten_Br=C3=B8rup?= , Honnappa Nagarahalli , "Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)" , Thomas Monjalon , Aaron Conole , Ferruh Yigit X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 1:26=E2=80=AFAM Patrick Robb wr= ote: > On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 6:33=E2=80=AFPM Patrick Robb = wrote: >> >> >> For your patch, it looks like there are actually more eal flags test fai= lures: http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2023-August/444170.html. = In any case, for debugging purposes, I will do a run with the eal_flags_fil= e_prefix_autotest also included and send you the meson test detail log on s= lack. >> > Quick follow up - I see with your patch it does pass on eal_flags_file_pr= efix_autotest, but as stated fails some others now. The detailed slack logs= are DM'ed to you on slack. Thanks! Thanks for the report. Interestingly those failures pointed out that I broke secondary processes when no port gets initialised in the primary process. I'll send a v3. --=20 David Marchand