From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 529BFA04DC; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:13:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D0BAD67; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:13:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1A9AD62 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:13:27 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1603181606; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=QxmEjClIIY6QkpasBQYUyFxI2hkgRcPGLYly0dLt3KA=; b=Ns6gO8b5Fe9Dlsk4ArD8Nju20yBMhHehLsWOh837IrSVFmBDA9XZCOuleFgBQoNL2rmjIA ECwHkVtjtqwzS/QcQdExcXwXBlUlBumFc0O964QjZcBl7l1qgxC5vWNQZOxy9HfKYPgJPf 1Gzb64UVCN3KCAGl9thmo+ktcyotmWI= Received: from mail-vs1-f70.google.com (mail-vs1-f70.google.com [209.85.217.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-518-YKj4AZeTN7-i7NZWkO7Auw-1; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 04:13:22 -0400 X-MC-Unique: YKj4AZeTN7-i7NZWkO7Auw-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f70.google.com with SMTP id 7so315831vsu.23 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 01:13:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QxmEjClIIY6QkpasBQYUyFxI2hkgRcPGLYly0dLt3KA=; b=tW/dqGgMV86pvl4Pi0iJ2RSit7N488tz+HS2Z0dVh5fdnTEl3y28zwIvFjFPoYxOtY 3XOjeyIjsmhrQ3xnaGX0s/2nzcibgtj4DYbRcSueEZOTHmZkE/uSt1hOH8BRzqn46MSY 4y1LflR93ufL8LRNWaaAIZxSF2nVLRbeXxq8WfAUOkffRM7A2Apcdke/gohCywNb36jP v+pLbw9yb898bNAxpbhIXBiH8kIijY/Oftu42B4ptY6VpfTi3bBQbI0owDGfb1lm5CqZ KWng1641ADzQCF0Qsuah3vTF16Wfvn4MOcIJs2BVacU1SfJ4aGlOnYWU83WdrSqN0Hrm qn2g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530YueS4RZ9hisimctEnJILapYyoHu5L+WmR7bX3B4Jz6DU4mSmF 5AGp+qVXjbSF4cLbHGHiSvpX5DyPmywSLEUeJRNCK5kIArcqGx1xHbxt0wIZhVZFYKhK+UbWLH8 6ZcNfPcvvg1i9y6t0MLg= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:4983:: with SMTP id e3mr641675uad.41.1603181602131; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 01:13:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxxUzwtMJ3fXGZKWHiZMvIhdfP3cJ9zyBnomvNUHj/CM05r8DVsfCef/Cma4fV+Rq8M8o73Xx/PF1T760ZCbEQ= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:4983:: with SMTP id e3mr641665uad.41.1603181601926; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 01:13:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201019233336.9627-1-dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20201019233336.9627-1-dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:13:11 +0200 Message-ID: To: Dmitry Kozlyuk , Narcisa Ana Maria Vasile , "Dmitry Malloy (MESHCHANINOV)" , Pallavi Kadam Cc: dev , nd , Dharmik Thakkar , Honnappa Nagarahalli , Thomas Monjalon Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] rcu: build on Windows X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 1:34 AM Dharmik Thakkar wrote: > > Build the lib for Windows. > > Change-Id: Ib83431a9ee56a7b38445f0474cb9a12b17cf18f9 > Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar > --- > lib/meson.build | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/lib/meson.build b/lib/meson.build > index dd55b5cb53e4..1bb019720c6a 100644 > --- a/lib/meson.build > +++ b/lib/meson.build > @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ if is_windows > 'telemetry', > 'eal', > 'ring', > + 'rcu', > 'mempool', 'mbuf', 'net', 'meter', 'ethdev', 'pci', > 'cmdline', > 'hash', > -- > 2.17.1 > If we skip the new failures in Intel CI due to kni build being broken, I see that Windows build is fine but I have no log of it. UNH lab skipped testing this patch, as it is a RFC (iiuc). We need more tests, but on the principle, what do you think about enabling rcu? -- David Marchand