From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6340746744; Wed, 14 May 2025 10:43:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15AC340651; Wed, 14 May 2025 10:43:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7162240041 for ; Wed, 14 May 2025 10:43:43 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1747212223; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=kPaMgTAp0EXZnY95Xl/yroXsLXRSxLjn0Ks/lG9kuUs=; b=e+PVruPNno0bbeJ66ZVjvvnoyyguRnK7uggpwhotW+VX/a6gcK0Cr5d7XdkFuuuaHvjoyV X8ey9aC9H4ps6Um46BZJC7m4oiekIzxGEZ2BIz33VQPWRXSgISgRXZvlOicGnzH7H+mkLU 7KTErKLAllJQ2F+7KD4Fn3RlG0aBIXs= Received: from mail-lf1-f70.google.com (mail-lf1-f70.google.com [209.85.167.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-97-aVufxOlqOUmya_kxD32MgA-1; Wed, 14 May 2025 04:43:39 -0400 X-MC-Unique: aVufxOlqOUmya_kxD32MgA-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: aVufxOlqOUmya_kxD32MgA_1747212218 Received: by mail-lf1-f70.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-54fc8c477fbso2771942e87.0 for ; Wed, 14 May 2025 01:43:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1747212218; x=1747817018; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kPaMgTAp0EXZnY95Xl/yroXsLXRSxLjn0Ks/lG9kuUs=; b=OBXLKhyuQf79rkTkMVSbcq+cNpuuD+ImIKBfDXw9FnWk3tKhxKwy90MQ+KgPu/WmtF MXR8dOioH1n9P37RZDwkrI9poMvU/xiSbX/ZgCs3nDb2+QDRC6Xj9q+6uOdBaeJkLWg7 KGi6HPCMVRauQf4kAOYDSsN9XrKpLN9naqzn9O6fw8frjmE0Xxt4+7DXjXtzbDm0rEbg IaextFsK3IlBYfWmL7ULnbSxhgL0hehxa6pCn5nQqdYx9wZ8vn8kGHB/XxVHLMCnKsZr vkgyLC0H+IAyh2Q4cTLNssdaiU5TYGhISkyF0Ok7p3mlERs4j/eTxE2Nqb03K8+ueUyM /9qQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWwrEZJTqGVOSllWFqLO9Wi5lxWmIXCuBGOw3OjVS13j6jOY2DHOtocV/H+YZR1XTo49bs=@dpdk.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyquiatx3jvfkXmZxabum4fwjsgeNXrCL1C0WvIwOCAmDHhgSC6 wbs9BAxoYuQBsMT7BTp8Y1ayj0rV8qe9x1uYWtgl32jQiSfTGednxp+rzqtubi6zGwj9ayUKHHU Vi4QCSpWINShzDSqqg6ZbAfttsEOoQlISK/zjdoyxwgED5d3PoF+2ZFLY83gOTHMR6JRhsKUXmt jXSmjClaqEfOXh8bw= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvWtgGT/jvuKyys6UhMMXeLMCsLGYC1bwfZOJ+IWlkBs+ulp7yd+wk2mnNdYbQ /ZLwpk3l74hWj8PLcRtVKfx+ZR6CoHD76uOoU3oC6NMRFyr7D0XDfbDdg+DhtK3j7M9UsXbc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:6719:b0:54a:cc75:3d81 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-550d5fac3a8mr773161e87.4.1747212217700; Wed, 14 May 2025 01:43:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF9w3gbzfhGybHvXIdZFWwyuE6BsZM7dBzFx3g2MOVHwFwJfq9fJtIUjlwfxQ6YEkodqYx/pnMW7ryc1HX6M2M= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:6719:b0:54a:cc75:3d81 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-550d5fac3a8mr773151e87.4.1747212217274; Wed, 14 May 2025 01:43:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20250513235308.2200865-1-joshwash@google.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 10:43:25 +0200 X-Gm-Features: AX0GCFt0FF4nvSEhaNnmYaIFPWGCpXl_4jzfG_SkMtd6k_rgOzLl_Wl1ajbQAmM Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/gve: remove gve-specific PCI revision ID macros To: Joshua Washington , Thomas Monjalon Cc: Jeroen de Borst , dev@dpdk.org, Stephen Hemminger X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: tCgPNfjtLmbm-6675n1BtnMFyb6cMhG54LAeXqPB5eQ_1747212218 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Hello, Thanks for the cleanup. On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 2:46=E2=80=AFAM Joshua Washington wrote: > > Patch doesn't apply to the main branch of dpdk-next-net: > https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2025-May/877522.html > > It seems like the diffbase patch only exists in the for-main branch. > When is for-main expected to be merged into main, and should we be > building against for-main or main? Similarly, what should this > compilation test build against? Stephen is out for some time (until next week?). Thomas may pull next-net soon. (@Thomas it would be great if this additional change was squashed in 96a1290b6258 ("net/gve: support for gVNIC PCI revision 1 and later") while pulling.) But otherwise this cleanup can be merged after. In any case, for net drivers update, please continue basing your work on next-net. Thanks. --=20 David Marchand