From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6785AA00E6
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:44:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFC651D3F5;
	Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:44:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-vs1-f65.google.com (mail-vs1-f65.google.com
 [209.85.217.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC65D1B993
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:44:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-vs1-f65.google.com with SMTP id g24so1176462vso.8
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:44:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=FX7Lcwmitc26Uar7HfCSEM49JlbYzMQF66M4ucbQ04A=;
 b=JfguN2Oc4v4k0zZ7/ejNkBMJwXX65/PReB/w8tkPqL343PFcPIg8fq3Y1Pv4xyIUa6
 KSxXK4d/YARv/yCl70jqMDZJ5V4DcIhbBYnQpu3/3uetYFAYwBS3kdTh8jAJF1EQ254D
 LquvLGvIPM74SLzUNO2cY20Ahkn5DJIv/2iJCG2BjRCF9jQX/SlWJma+qiZYdmfvzNtE
 MhAZzAb02x4c+MWE/pfgLD4r8zrcUJzyzfg8G3eRwQKhxH2rQxnVPjlqmTWtBSahmvdA
 JdHFePXdVTsEdDqab4oQlbQqdsB4qHc0LtAqWcLhJ2PU/UdpO/i05tlUhraZieXGBMBa
 s/CA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWZhQYfwWY/grILDrkumiw5n4tkln9sKdr5sxXQyILRceTG+qqy
 jEu4tf/3iTpTaCbOrTckm/ttUHxf+jDDpKSWpQW15w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyXIF6+VIKxcZTvV7pt4Q8sVsrP7/f1kJejr9rLlIo2Z5FPhs/ZZlAL4EYGpHlhoqoRyQKDTmYK1aqHdPAATCE=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:d019:: with SMTP id r25mr3765584vsi.39.1560498282088; 
 Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:44:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190405203036.27109-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
 <2320193.YWZSPdnyqu@xps>
In-Reply-To: <2320193.YWZSPdnyqu@xps>
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:44:31 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8yxDSSAb5+dxYL5JHGC5LZcGHkU2MUxn8C4bV-SgBGA0g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: resort symbols in EXPERIMENTAL section
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 9:39 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:

> 06/04/2019 05:30, Stephen Hemminger:
> > The symbols in the EXPERIMENTAL were close to alphabetic
> > order but running sort showed several mistakes.
> >
> > This has no impact on code, API, ABI or otherwise.
> > Purely for humans.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
>
> I don't think it's worth adding a layer of git history for this sort.
> I would prefer to leave it as is.
>
>
If this is about preferrence, I would prefer we have those symbols sorted
per versions that introduced them ;-).
Much easier to check and see if they are candidates for entering stable ABI.


-- 
David Marchand