From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61129A04E7; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 09:14:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 184C0C814; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 09:14:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 447AEC810 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 09:14:37 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1604477675; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=OZcB3e3NSqUhgoXTBWFO/8RW6FzMnVvtr3MCsSZwQTw=; b=THi2NO+su4zKALWoR4su5arGbB/yEP5MQcA8GH2oHT4Na4aSOyemmhkNdq91vAJqiQC5rW rPgsHAZPcf0GcPKBvtIHM3vTH3w8+/xWtnIkBMVLwt6jjtnezZmF+FLatgzOXL2s54SiUm QxIUUhmoompp+CZuotor/uvRcbbLntI= Received: from mail-vs1-f72.google.com (mail-vs1-f72.google.com [209.85.217.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-573-L30-6W2xNY6zz98BqtmCBw-1; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 03:14:34 -0500 X-MC-Unique: L30-6W2xNY6zz98BqtmCBw-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f72.google.com with SMTP id v17so3018450vsq.19 for ; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 00:14:34 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OZcB3e3NSqUhgoXTBWFO/8RW6FzMnVvtr3MCsSZwQTw=; b=fscNM/Gv5Qg+SzJuyP5SVSwACu/qKY0yenUlmU47N3hW4rcuspq6y878g7oZyWXryp 4pA5VIyIzYnYYd2C5h8NQZ3QJnpsBLJ7CUiFpXuN0VhfEsDdM0bYeguHf8axd9M7zgJk Vei4RFxkAEMs6E/xJei6ohMwq6bHBWvk6vD3batztPeTNQwMDTRWuep4I/Ec4ZFsdy66 LVDVtsgmiNBS1NNCBxJZDGZeo0+eT+mg4i0Ir6xIM1GJhUMuX3gf1rD9xkuRbJdNcjCR r51L5BR1rXpJoTKc7UC2yTRVge+nMTcsnzYnaOHpfvpoxj6bJni2r6+uCmxE8yBfmTxz 9qzw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ExRO4EN644Xw8MBt2+gqILNm9hG3cEZAy3FeNAoEZbztQiNyC 1dh3uWS+bZbu5d6bR3V1+ByLX3YqC/A3NefDrHRgaXE/nP03RctuScnanrUlpcgqqtCJD7D953A zzk4gosEiU1FbaoAhB3o= X-Received: by 2002:a67:2fca:: with SMTP id v193mr22027595vsv.18.1604477673609; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 00:14:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwLicAeif7ru1lbzt6AOpuAjtokWujbjoYkQ56IONbhwGa7gSrniXMI7B3tt6MxO9/TZt107y+FkYRcECCurbg= X-Received: by 2002:a67:2fca:: with SMTP id v193mr22027587vsv.18.1604477673407; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 00:14:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201104072810.105498-1-leyi.rong@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20201104072810.105498-1-leyi.rong@intel.com> From: David Marchand Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 09:14:22 +0100 Message-ID: To: Leyi Rong Cc: Qi Zhang , dev Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/l3fwd: enable multiple Tx queues on a lcore X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" If I count well, this is the v3 of the patch. Please version your patches. On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 8:52 AM Leyi Rong wrote: > > Currently, l3fwd doesn't support multiple Tx queues, while > multiple Rx queues is supported. > To improve the throughput performance when polling multiple > queues, this patch enables multiple Tx queues handling on a lcore. Why would there be a gain in using multiple txq? Is it with hw txq? sw txq? .. ? -- David Marchand