From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 019B4A034D; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 10:51:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 864D3410F4; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 10:51:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E784F410E6 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 10:51:27 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1641462687; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=M3AnuNHIh4CWcv1NtTmHH1tj3UeR2XoFZvo/G+TYb6w=; b=cfxlvQSG+B9yhVwg5uLIMRaiDW7aK1jtQWHfJB3Lo4/42LR0+YtmU8vO3AEFhpxgImICer uCg8wmT3CYoT4xFGoTojAlgDAHgLtli/O+5+Z7IyYXt3C4AmaN59xceUCSAD6cpBXexere uDNKGUVfCXnLgGZ5fX3I1wgA9zD/1xQ= Received: from mail-lj1-f198.google.com (mail-lj1-f198.google.com [209.85.208.198]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-37-2irgM6PUNbqlE-sYYRb5Xw-1; Thu, 06 Jan 2022 04:51:25 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 2irgM6PUNbqlE-sYYRb5Xw-1 Received: by mail-lj1-f198.google.com with SMTP id o11-20020a2e90cb000000b0022dd251d30aso694312ljg.8 for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2022 01:51:24 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=M3AnuNHIh4CWcv1NtTmHH1tj3UeR2XoFZvo/G+TYb6w=; b=TfG1FCBoriDeEHZMuOJ8Ya3rZBmvqVmtTJIgFIAwjm/lOValk4lksrUy/uHUqfQrSv jF+qH9GGbj0JPcOtxucBtOrSc4+v1dFbFAP88RNQP1gHViFDxMglopNKF6Uv0ShQ6m5+ WzOC1aFAOhFCA3pKs22Uuwud8UEyBS+ApXd/i6FnQvXsBmWV2DKwjqhhAam4O77j/mt/ AOujB1etTQsObU2aSRp+0lt6vm1ju+Jc3KZJ57CW2xo9i5bjUIa8NPWL0tWogitJflp/ 5h5/UB7rCcQpQwxbKOvjJZPezQJwrHGofNLNbW+GTPhKcgC9XQ9/1rqOQtd/SVnju7A6 YIjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5326cvKDF0H0MP1khxcuAucy7RzpaTAVkGVH157bFurK9ifRdVKF +g5DgBUWV6onZ/cRDMewcwEvN0aVSkBpnXRXB9YwfTI1uBCaiXV+MR5qYK2tnsIkhswDaHpHrm/ em2GW7QNYwgQ/OvZbagE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:32c3:: with SMTP id f3mr9350001lfg.484.1641462683513; Thu, 06 Jan 2022 01:51:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz3r2iftl/ThlZQLfloefdJwhsg8g6DjVohH26E77yPjgtoMPczoXQrVP6R7PAAI8u6gexX4ky8gG+5+cTYrCw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:32c3:: with SMTP id f3mr9349982lfg.484.1641462683293; Thu, 06 Jan 2022 01:51:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210823100259.1619886-1-gakhil@marvell.com> <20220103150813.1694888-1-gakhil@marvell.com> In-Reply-To: <20220103150813.1694888-1-gakhil@marvell.com> From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 10:51:12 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] ethdev: introduce IP reassembly offload To: Akhil Goyal Cc: dev , Anoob Joseph , Radu Nicolau , Declan Doherty , Hemant Agrawal , Matan Azrad , "Ananyev, Konstantin" , Thomas Monjalon , "Yigit, Ferruh" , Andrew Rybchenko , Olivier Matz , Rosen Xu Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 4:08 PM Akhil Goyal wrote: > > As discussed in the RFC[1] sent in 21.11, a new offload is > introduced in ethdev for IP reassembly. > > This patchset add the RX offload and an application to test it. > Currently, the offload is tested along with inline IPsec processing. > It can also be updated as a standalone offload without IPsec, if there > are some hardware available to test it. > The patchset is tested on cnxk platform. The driver implementation is > added as a separate patchset. > > [1]: http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210823100259.1619886-1-gakhil@marvell.com/ > > > Akhil Goyal (8): > ethdev: introduce IP reassembly offload > ethdev: add dev op for IP reassembly configuration > ethdev: add mbuf dynfield for incomplete IP reassembly > security: add IPsec option for IP reassembly > app/test: add unit cases for inline IPsec offload > app/test: add IP reassembly case with no frags > app/test: add IP reassembly cases with multiple fragments > app/test: add IP reassembly negative cases > > app/test/meson.build | 1 + > app/test/test_inline_ipsec.c | 1036 +++++++++++++++++ > .../test_inline_ipsec_reassembly_vectors.h | 790 +++++++++++++ I see no update in MAINTAINERS for those new files. So I think they end up in the "main" repo scope. You can either update MAINTAINERS (changing the app/test/test_ipsec* pattern as app/test/test_*ipsec*) or rename files as app/test/test_ipsec_inline.c, for example. -- David Marchand