From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C0445DCD; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 14:28:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEC67402AE; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 14:28:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD2E54014F for ; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 14:28:54 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1732886934; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=FeYc/ANYvpFbjPGbhHURMNt1ti/vOnnUdICpiykUW0g=; b=DtEoEXTrW7AKcBUi5DtcWBsnABwMLY+erEl53f1g+JT2WRygO9dx6aiOSyaE7T/D8cASVe opd7CpRE6+zSh7o+UY59B7XShRzyPJCVioOep+l4AjxveGh9q2iPiuvLvWiiLf2cA8svOn ymOG97d6zb/ghpdh///7fJrzeR/mQHw= Received: from mail-lf1-f70.google.com (mail-lf1-f70.google.com [209.85.167.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-195-PK00cBgoNxq_A-ImAnjyDw-1; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 08:28:53 -0500 X-MC-Unique: PK00cBgoNxq_A-ImAnjyDw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: PK00cBgoNxq_A-ImAnjyDw Received: by mail-lf1-f70.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-53df7f6f36dso1310440e87.2 for ; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 05:28:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1732886931; x=1733491731; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=FeYc/ANYvpFbjPGbhHURMNt1ti/vOnnUdICpiykUW0g=; b=NiQsKoyyFreAnF+wqysZ8sNm5rQFtmCTufqTiJclbQkmb6rh7WPUd4L6ucuwh1HC4j /CxFcN3s//d0HluGjuH2PQlxglZ6QKcSLNSjRKEWxB7VibAzvNR80sparcTEINi5svuU vrBruCkSgIueWNTKycDdscxWtUjpKbKQPODajPW4wb/9jenqmuYKdxmXb1wxATb7qXco kcRbY34gTz9qY45v+ChBztDkRf8FmbCK2zlU2UNlltruuSnOpBWrom/X7S+bVJifp8q5 4HQWBg+a+djUAvfD0SQGdnScVolsNPkIBdSboTZy/8HLTOZ1z32V5fz9Yg8Fyh20Q2w7 XNJA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwQqPXx8f6Bj3OSpMv9ASyumz4JmrNrvhQ2jPMSWYV14E7VeKAc 0AsFMf6bQEOxR1ZJGL7CcbD3HyMe9SxGWR34F7qmMQ0RC3hfnHO5LYSHygD+iwWvYTAUWHZj3nD hrZBSy9saiN8Xg7TOqMO6juhGVjWwK6QK+zceA7oogsEFsLXJCVdv/DqfHVEBL4P5w2QZmOcta+ wevIYR16rbuuMs+nA= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncu8YdL8+TVcby8A9aHqdejoSB46doh9OxRuSn82IsjMt6k08lOT8FBsjR6qSYH 4uWoZz/yj2Gn6wzqYp5xx3AIXCXO1u3dIpg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:33c8:b0:536:53f0:2f8e with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-53df00ff1ebmr6904786e87.37.1732886931514; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 05:28:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEEbNEk+VL4ytFoux1Y3wdxnMCXT6s90qINe5JiBizePmwY5n45AvIpyrIctutvLihMLaoEmYS80N+uWPmocx0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:33c8:b0:536:53f0:2f8e with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-53df00ff1ebmr6904772e87.37.1732886931175; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 05:28:51 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <9af1231398c4ba116d3b89164690feace37293a9.1732810125.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com> <890de9246f00065a30398729d4c2baf047002584.1732873932.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <890de9246f00065a30398729d4c2baf047002584.1732873932.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com> From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 14:28:40 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] usertools/devbind: fix NUMA node display To: Anatoly Burakov Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Robin Jarry , Stephen Hemminger X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: bA2YYCpeACKYkiuhTONvU4Z_L77TD50t7FjGz31LwW0_1732886932 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 10:52=E2=80=AFAM Anatoly Burakov wrote: > > On some systems (particularly ones with NUMA disabled in BIOS), even > though NUMA nodes may be present in sysfs, the lspci command will not > have NUMANode keys in them, which will cause an exception. Fix to check > if NUMANode keys are available in lspci output before enabling NUMA node > output. > > Fixes: a7d69cef8f20 ("usertools/devbind: print device NUMA node") > > Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov Acked-by: Robin Jarry Applied, thanks. --=20 David Marchand