From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF0B942CB2; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 09:13:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EF1140E0F; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 09:13:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4968240DDB for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 09:13:51 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1686726830; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=NUTuuXcP/JvANooQSG2NKIbor5WsIqYV1CFGwhDwZkY=; b=QdEb4wgiyb90Ji9ufB6TkKnZy3++9a6bl2jNSOQnN7RAvv9WzdpScRPurUJx5hezaOiXFT oayEKWD6WFEqgBG2eDZM+p9HtdhSj7vdIO1703aLJity90WacaMW1zjNKOYZRb14TxTsxa mO5e6QTrQ54o2cKM8o6wWDhbVwCxeW0= Received: from mail-pj1-f71.google.com (mail-pj1-f71.google.com [209.85.216.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-303-5JW89TnRP0uyD7RpRmDFoQ-1; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 03:13:47 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 5JW89TnRP0uyD7RpRmDFoQ-1 Received: by mail-pj1-f71.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-25deb8603cbso364204a91.1 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 00:13:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686726826; x=1689318826; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=NUTuuXcP/JvANooQSG2NKIbor5WsIqYV1CFGwhDwZkY=; b=d45osOzgye4Y4JBjX4EjD4PvtdjStRJHg+FZk9GGQSir4olzqO6eb5yt/57Z/S5adL iEh1ycDXx3hs6j/PU93GszwQHlEVFEvSs/BbW2NFGXaKPJTbdA3rEO2tZn/+ri9SU/8C vH33sjAUrLlzogniXhEcVW0XMv77CNDNjzIIk02i87PML3GWu5YBFnBYM1ONKlQCFQJE TqW4PmIVP0q//9SLj6cqCMZqBTYe2bwrrxFutjsivkD2eN2Zc6e+93LMgOE6o9iyPFfb Lm2q3DDpLunZcemcBEcLAC1SVdRXbalBqd+PJ57vKAVemT70LYTzDnyLzbUfmVc0Zgjw wMCw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxz5Tj+A541KUodIZaf26SQnNT8EYLVimEAUSWIPg1rh7lKn8hG Ldbk3LBZAcodWLXKX9o3vQjrf4Z9wVQyyVaU/eVkWBlw7D0fyxoYmsz8KO1XGauGNBFAvAP0mT8 a4/a5NYdBbC81fhLBATY= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:990a:b0:255:9038:fe0d with SMTP id b10-20020a17090a990a00b002559038fe0dmr801962pjp.38.1686726826151; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 00:13:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ6t9YpNRJpqdJVwgng6pywZvBAzDF+iCE3Pv05WFGU90hOnB+63pq76nZz4Lc6vLe4T4b8UXkaiPBSbD2BdWf8= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:990a:b0:255:9038:fe0d with SMTP id b10-20020a17090a990a00b002559038fe0dmr801953pjp.38.1686726825779; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 00:13:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230612163242.GB18991@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 09:13:34 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Bug 1249] [dpdk-23.07] ixgbe port stop failed after launch testpmd To: "Yang, Qiming" Cc: Tyler Retzlaff , "Wu, Wenjun1" , "dev@dpdk.org" , =?UTF-8?Q?Morten_Br=C3=B8rup?= X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 8:57=E2=80=AFAM Yang, Qiming wrote: > > Hi, Tyler > May I know why you need to change the legacy atomics? rte_atomic32_xxx se= ries action is performance optimized, I don't think the change is needed as= no bug or other requirement. The deprecation of rte_atomic32_xxx atomics is not a new topic. Performance impact is not a problem for control path code, is it? --=20 David Marchand